[fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.6.0 Beta

[Greg Boone]

Yes. We can remove those packages. They are included because they are in still in all the build scripts.

Greg

From: fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jason Birch
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 3:45 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] RE: FDO 3.6.0 Beta

Hey Greg,

It looks like there is some confusion in the PostGIS/PostgreSQL part of the distribution.

In source files, it looks like PostGIS provider is being distributed; I thought we were discontinuing this for 3.6?

In binary files, it looks like there is a separate package for PostgreSQL, but I suspect that this may be the PostGIS provider since the generic odbc download also includes PostgreSQL?

I didn't download the SDK to see if the PostGIS provider was still being included there.

Jason
On 27 October 2010 12:33, Greg Boone wrote:
Hi All,

I have built and posted an FDO 3.6.0 Windows (32/64) Beta at:

http://fdo.osgeo.org/content/fdo-360-downloads

The binaries wee built from tag:

http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/browser/tags/3.6.0_BETA1

A Linux beta is still a work in progress.

Greg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20101027/fadc1bb6/attachment.html