[fdo-internals] Please review https://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/attachment/ticket/917

Greg Boone greg.boone at autodesk.com
Thu May 19 13:52:53 PDT 2016

Hi Christine, Andy,

Please create an RFC document t and formally request this change through the PSC and fdo-Internals.

Here is the link to the RFC page on osgo.org<http://osgo.org>


On May 19, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Greg Boone <greg.boone at autodesk.com<mailto:greg.boone at autodesk.com>> wrote:

Hi Christine,

This may be an a good solution for the customer that reported the issue, but from an FDO API perspective this is an odd fit. The Provider requests that a curve string be generated and instead a line string is generated, with associated data loss.

I think we would need to meet to discuss. Is this the only alternate? Why doesn't the WFS provider handle this as a special case and not change the base FDO API?


From: fdo-internals [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Christine Bao
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 10:00 PM
To: fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: [fdo-internals] Please review https://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/attachment/ticket/917

Hi all,

Please review patch https://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/attachment/ticket/917/917.patch for fixing ticket https://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/attachment/ticket/917. Thanks.

Thanks & regards,

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20160519/b9ba028b/attachment.html>

More information about the fdo-internals mailing list