[fdo-internals] Please review https://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/attachment/ticket/917

[Greg Boone]

Forgot to add the link.

http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfcs

Greg

On May 19, 2016, at 4:52 PM, Greg Boone <greg.boone at autodesk.com<mailto:greg.boone at autodesk.com>> wrote:


Hi Christine, Andy,

Please create an RFC document t and formally request this change through the PSC and fdo-Internals.

Here is the link to the RFC page on osgo.org<http://osgo.org>

Regards
Greg

On May 19, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Greg Boone <greg.boone at autodesk.com<mailto:greg.boone at autodesk.com>> wrote:

Hi Christine,

This may be an a good solution for the customer that reported the issue, but from an FDO API perspective this is an odd fit. The Provider requests that a curve string be generated and instead a line string is generated, with associated data loss.

I think we would need to meet to discuss. Is this the only alternate? Why doesn't the WFS provider handle this as a special case and not change the base FDO API?

Greg

From: fdo-internals [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Christine Bao
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 10:00 PM
To: fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: [fdo-internals] Please review https://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/attachment/ticket/917

Hi all,

Please review patch https://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/attachment/ticket/917/917.patch for fixing ticket https://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/attachment/ticket/917. Thanks.

Thanks & regards,
Christine


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/fdo-internals/attachments/20160519/896f652e/attachment.html>