[fdo-internals] Please review https://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/attachment/ticket/917
Christine.Bao at autodesk.com
Thu May 19 19:26:16 PDT 2016
Thanks for the advice. The RFC is created https://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/wiki/FDORfc71.
Thanks & regards,
From: Greg Boone
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 4:57 AM
To: fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org; Christine Bao; Andy Zhang
Cc: Brent Robinson; Orest Halustchak
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] Please review https://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/attachment/ticket/917
Forgot to add the link.
On May 19, 2016, at 4:52 PM, Greg Boone <greg.boone at autodesk.com<mailto:greg.boone at autodesk.com>> wrote:
Hi Christine, Andy,
Please create an RFC document t and formally request this change through the PSC and fdo-Internals.
Here is the link to the RFC page on osgo.org<http://osgo.org>
On May 19, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Greg Boone <greg.boone at autodesk.com<mailto:greg.boone at autodesk.com>> wrote:
This may be an a good solution for the customer that reported the issue, but from an FDO API perspective this is an odd fit. The Provider requests that a curve string be generated and instead a line string is generated, with associated data loss.
I think we would need to meet to discuss. Is this the only alternate? Why doesn't the WFS provider handle this as a special case and not change the base FDO API?
From: fdo-internals [mailto:fdo-internals-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Christine Bao
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 10:00 PM
To: fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:fdo-internals at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: [fdo-internals] Please review https://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/attachment/ticket/917
Please review patch https://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/attachment/ticket/917/917.patch for fixing ticket https://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/attachment/ticket/917. Thanks.
Thanks & regards,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the fdo-internals