[fdo-users] SHP modifications issue

[Ytse]

Hum I'm sorry but I don't know how to step into the
unmanaged code, I can't go further than 

System::Void
NAMESPACE_OSGEO_FDO_CONNECTIONS::IConnectionImp::Close()
{
	EXCEPTION_HANDLER(GetImpObj()->Close())
}

in mgiconnectionimp.cpp

There probably is a leak somewhere as it works/fails
without logic : I can reproduce the same manipulation
several times in a row (delete all features but one)
and the result won't be the same.
The issue is probably somewhere in my code, I'll try
to find it by myself.

Now one last thing, I've talking about delete, update
is ok, but I have another issue with insert : 
the new features are seen by ArcView 3.2 but not by
Mapguide viewer 6.5 (which the users of my app are
using). Any idea ?
...


--- Dan Stoica <dan.stoica at autodesk.com> a écrit :

> 1) I'll drop this change, maybe today.
> 
> 2) place a breakpoint in
> ShpConnection::~ShpConnection (void):
> 
>     // Do files compression (get rid of the deleted
> rows)
>     CompressFileSets();
> 
> When your connection is released: 
> a) the desctuctor should be called
> b) CompressFileSets() should find mGlobalRefCount ==
> 1.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dan.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ytse [mailto:bill_gfr at yahoo.fr] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 4:04 AM
> To: Dan Stoica; Robert Fortin; Pierre Dalcourt;
> fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: RE : RE: RE : RE: RE : RE: RE : RE:
> [fdo-users] SHP modifications issue
> 
> 1) Ok I'll change this right after writing this mail
> and I'll give it a go. Will you commit this
> correction
> or do I have to keep in mind that I might have to
> change this each time a new FDO version is released
> ?
> 
> 2) still hoping :)
> 
> I think I really need to have a closer look at the
> FDO
> internal, I can read C++ code but the thing is of
> course that I don't know where to start :)
> 
> thank you again
> 
> 
> --- Dan Stoica <dan.stoica at autodesk.com> a écrit :
> 
> > 1) have a look at:
> > 
> > /providers/SHP/src/ShpRead/DataRow.cpp line #75:
> > 
> >     else if (cVALID_RECORD_ID !=
> ((char*)buffer)[0])
> >         SetDeleted (true);
> > 
> > I have no problem changing it to:
> > 
> >     else if (cDELETED_RECORD_ID ==
> > ((char*)buffer)[0])
> >         SetDeleted (true);
> > 
> > 2) Good luck :-)
> > 
> > Dan.
> 
> 
> 
> 	
> 
> 	
> 		
>
___________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses
> à toutes vos questions ! 
> Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des
> expériences des internautes sur Yahoo!
> Questions/Réponses 
> http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
> 



	

	
		
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions ! 
Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses 
http://fr.answers.yahoo.com