[fdo-users] MPolygon <-> FDO

Maksim Sestic max at geoinova.com
Thu Mar 13 03:25:31 EDT 2008


Hi Gavin,

Managed AcDb MPolygon support is exposed through AcMPolygonMGD.dll which
sits in Asdk installation folder, e.g. C:\Program Files\Autodesk Map 3D
200x.

Regards,
Maksim Sestic



Gavin Cramer wrote:
> 
> Hi, Dennis.   Being on vacation means that my time is my own.  Besides,
> this is a diversion from shovelling snow here in wintery Ottawa.  :-)
> 
> Tessellating to a LineString seems like a bit much to get around this
> glitch.  I think that I can get the necessary environment operational to
> reproduce your problem.  I looked in the case file and found several
> versions of your project.  The first one built for me with simple path
> changes.  However, the most recent  version has a vsproj file appears to
> be missing the AcMPolygonMGD reference, which I am also having trouble
> adding.  My .NET skills are very rusty.  I'll let you know if I get that
> going later today.  I might need a patched file from you.
> 
> Gavin
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of djonio
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 6:36 AM
> To: fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: RE: [fdo-users] MPolygon <-> FDO
> 
> 
> Gavin,
> 
> I hesitated to respond yesterday since you are on vacation and I had to
> noodle through my approach to this issue anyway. For me your last post
> brought me closure on the current state of FDO and those "curvee
> thingees".
> However, I am still not sure of what approach I should take. I am leaning
> toward the good'ol, tryed and true linearstring approach. I have been
> doing
> that for a couple years now. (back then I think I used AGF ... whatever).
> I
> talked to my users yesterday and they are kinda' sorta' OK with an
> "emulated" arc approach. When a round-trip is needed they are willing to
> deal with those "mini-lines". I will have to build some test cases for
> them
> but from their perspective anything is better than the tedium that I put
> them through today ... maybe we take a little step instead of a big one.
> 
> Sorry for that slight digression. I take your recommendation to heart and
> as
> time permits will look into the FDO component myself.
> 
> You have a great vacation!
> dennis
> 
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/MPolygon-%3C-%3E-FDO-tp15873165s18162p15975862.html
> Sent from the fdo-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-users mailing list
> fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users
> _______________________________________________
> fdo-users mailing list
> fdo-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-users
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/MPolygon-%3C-%3E-FDO-tp15873165s18162p16022439.html
Sent from the fdo-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



More information about the fdo-users mailing list