[fdo-users] Re: WFS memory usage

[Robin Newton]

Robin Newton wrote:
> 
> I guess I should have also asked: (c) Is FdoXmlFeatureReaderImpl hanging
> on to all these features likely to be be a major factor in memory use? To
> which my current answer would have to be "no".
> 

That was a bit hasty. It turned out my replication example was falling foul
of the stack issue before it had a chance to exhaust heap space. With the
stack issue dealt with a I get a memory exhaustion problem that can be fixed
by tweaking the code to FdoXmlFeatureReaderImpl::ReadNext so that it
releases features which aren't needed any more.

I'm not quite sure what I'm going to do with this, but if I wanted to submit
a patch for consideration for the next release of FDO, what's the etiquette?
Is this something I should ask about on the 'internals' list?

Thanks,
Robin


--
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/WFS-memory-usage-tp6688451p6715370.html
Sent from the FDO Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.