[Fdo_dev] About RDBI's get_gen_id() function

[Mateusz Loskot]

Right :-)
Mat

Dan Stoica wrote:
> Therefore, Mateusz, the answer to your question is simple: YOU :-)
> 
> Cheers,
> Dan.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:43 PM
> To: Badreddine Karoui; fdo_dev
> Subject: RE: [Fdo_dev] About RDBI's get_gen_id() function
> 
> Any changes would have to go into the PostGIS branch only. Once the
> change has been reviewed it can be integrated into the GenericRDBMS
> trunk. This change should not be integrated into the 3.2.x branch.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Badreddine Karoui
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:32 PM
> To: fdo_dev
> Subject: RE: [Fdo_dev] About RDBI's get_gen_id() function
> 
> Go ahead. But can you hold off changing subversion until tomorrow?
> 
> Badreddine
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdo_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:fdo_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:17 PM
> To: fdo_dev
> Subject: Re: [Fdo_dev] About RDBI's get_gen_id() function
> 
> Badreddine Karoui wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>  The GDBI/RDBI interface is not cast in stone. Option 1 seems the
>> reasonable solution to me.
>> MySql driver just have to be fixed up in this
>> case and no need for the kludge of option 2.
> 
> OK, so I'm waiting for answer on my question who is going to fix it.
> I can do it too.
> 
> Cheers


-- 
Mateusz Loskot
http://mateusz.loskot.net