[FOSS-GPS] Can't get Ambiguity Validation Ratio to move
Danny Miller
dannym at austin.rr.com
Mon Jun 20 17:02:41 EDT 2011
It's working, and I'm excited!
Is there some way I can find more about "ratio factor of ambiguity
validation"? I understand the basics of integer ambiguity. I'm usually
seeing 1.2, rarely above 1.8 in this field. Is that good? Bad? What
could I expect?
Danny
On 6/20/2011 3:56 AM, Tomoji Takasu wrote:
> Dear Danny
>
>> In the data window of RTKNavi, I noticed the Lat/long/height of Base
>> is not listed with real numbers (90deg 0m). This isn't right- that
>> GPS has a fine solution in NMEA.
>
> You have to set the base-station position properly in
> Options dialog for relative modes. RTKNAVI never uses
> receiver's NMEA.
>
> This is FAQ. So I will add FAQ in the support page.
>
> regards,
>
> ********
> Tomoji TAKASU
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Danny Miller" <dannym at austin.rr.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 5:07 PM
> To: <foss-gps at lists.osgeo.org>
> Subject: [FOSS-GPS] Can't get Ambiguity Validation Ratio to move
>
>> I'm new to RTK. I have a pair of LEA-6T GPS units, one active
>> Sarantel SL-1206 quadrafiliar helix ant. There were supposed to be
>> two of those but the second one was DOA so I'm making do with an
>> active patch antenna for the second. I don't have an antenna file
>> for either of them. I'm using 2.4.1.
>>
>> I have UBX RXM-RAW and RXM-SFRB reading out of both of them at 5Hz
>> (tried this at 1Hz too). I can get a fix out of either one of them.
>> In Kinematic mode of RTKNavi, I get a position, but the "ratio factor
>> of ambiguity validation" factor is stuck at 0.0. I waited like an
>> hour and it was still at 0.
>>
>> In the data window of RTKNavi, I noticed the Lat/long/height of Base
>> is not listed with real numbers (90deg 0m). This isn't right- that
>> GPS has a fine solution in NMEA. Both Base and Rover are showing
>> strong (~45dbHz) signal bars in all colors.
>>
>> I looked under Solution 1 and Solution 2 and both have valid, similar
>> solutions.
>>
>> I looked under errors and saw:
>> eight "outlier rejected" per sample period (5Hz)
>> one "no double-differenced residuals" message
>>
>> I tried switching the COM ports for Base and Rover, effectively
>> switching which unit was which (neither is moving right now).
>> Nothing changed, the "Base" unit channel still has no Lat/long/height
>> and ambiguity validation is still 0. That is, the problem is not
>> tied to the GPS hardware unit.
>>
>> I tried disabling the Rover in RTKnavi. There's still no solution
>> under the Lat/Long/Height of Base. The signal strength bars all turn
>> gray.
>>
>> I tried the mkl version (I have an i7). It didn't change anything.
>> I tried 2.4.0 rtknavi. In that one, I can't get a rover solution to
>> show up at all, it's blank on the main window and rtkplot shows nothing.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Danny
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> This message is sent to you from FOSS-GPS at lists.osgeo.org mailing list.
>> Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your
>> subscription
>> For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This message is sent to you from FOSS-GPS at lists.osgeo.org mailing list.
> Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your
> subscription
> For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS
>
More information about the FOSS-GPS
mailing list