[FOSS-GPS] Cycle Slips and Number of Satellites RTKLIB

[Felipe G. Nievinski]

Normally by "loss of lock" it's meant a temporary state and that the
receiver has regained lock soon after -- it's not, e.g., that the satellite
has set on the horizon and will only rise up the day after.
Lots of loss of lock can be a consequence of cheap antenna or partial
obstructions in the line of sight, e.g., foliage.
-F.

Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:42:36 -0700 (MST)
> From: "bjorn.spockeli" <bjorn.spockeli at gmail.com>
> To: foss-gps at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: [FOSS-GPS] Cycle Slips and Number of Satellites RTKLIB
> Message-ID: <1418845356934-7573090.post at n2.nabble.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hi,
>
> Im using RTKLIB with in the moving-baseline mode with two LEA-6Ts.
>
> Looking at the logfiles I clearly see the Ambiguity being reset to 0 due to
> cycle slips, but I am not seeing fewer visible satellites. Shouldnt there
> be
> fewer visible satellites due to the loss of lock?
>
> Im thinking it has something to do with how RTKLIB determines the number
> valid satellites?
>
> Regards
> Bj?rn Spockeli
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://open-source-gps-related-discussion-and-support.1099874.n2.nabble.com/Cycle-Slips-and-Number-of-Satellites-RTKLIB-tp7573090.html
> Sent from the Open Source GPS-related discussion and support mailing list
> archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> FOSS-GPS mailing list
> FOSS-GPS at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps
>
> End of FOSS-GPS Digest, Vol 71, Issue 4
> ***************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss-gps/attachments/20141217/a842e230/attachment.html>