[FOSS-GPS] FOSS-GPS Digest, Vol 68, Issue 7

[Ambes Hagos]

Hi There,
I have a similar problem (L1 base station with NVS08C.
I tested with Toaglass and Tallysman antennas. The quality of antennas really matter.
The tallysman I used (is also more expensive)  gave better results but not as accurate as using GNSS base station.

My conclusion is you better look for L1 and L2 base station and better antenna than your Toaglass.

regards 
Ambes
________________________________________
Van: foss-gps-bounces at lists.osgeo.org <foss-gps-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> namens foss-gps-request at lists.osgeo.org <foss-gps-request at lists.osgeo.org>
Verzonden: woensdag 17 september 2014 23:06
Aan: foss-gps at lists.osgeo.org
Onderwerp: FOSS-GPS Digest, Vol 68, Issue 7

Send FOSS-GPS mailing list submissions to
        foss-gps at lists.osgeo.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        foss-gps-request at lists.osgeo.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        foss-gps-owner at lists.osgeo.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of FOSS-GPS digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Mobile Robot Experimentation (Sean Hyde)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 17:05:35 -0400
From: "Sean Hyde" <sean.a.hyde at gmail.com>
To: <foss-gps at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: [FOSS-GPS] Mobile Robot Experimentation
Message-ID: <0ddc01cfd2bb$20551d40$60ff57c0$@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hey Guys,



I've been playing around with RTKLib for a couple months now and have run
into some issues and I was wondering if anyone had any idea on how to
improve performance.



---Setup---

Base Station:

NVS08C on custom PCB using the receiver to power the antenna

Antenna is Taoglas Limited AA.161.301111
(http://www.taoglas.com/images/product_images/original_images/AA.161.301111.
pdf)

Antenna is on a 12" x 24" steel plate

Connected via FTDI->USB to Rasperry Pi

Raspberry Pi runs str2str to send the data to Windows laptop running rtknavi
using wifi backhaul



Rover:

NVS08C on custom PCB using the receiver to power the antenna

Antenna is Taoglas Limited AA.161.301111
(http://www.taoglas.com/images/product_images/original_images/AA.161.301111.
pdf)

Antenna is on a 18" x 18" steel plate

Connected via FTDI->USB to Rasperry Pi

Raspberry Pi runs str2str to send the data to Windows laptop running rtknavi
using wifi backhaul



The Rover setup is on a small mobile robot with a top speed of about 3mph.
It is in a city (Pittsburgh), but the sky is relatively unobstructed.



I'm running rtknavi in Kinematic mode using only GPS, L1+L2, 15deg elevation
mask.  The position that I input for the base station is a 5 hour average
(though it seems to have lost some precision when I pasted it?).  I have
tried both Continuous and Fix and Hold Integer Ambiguity Res.  I'll try to
attach screen shots of rtknavi.



Right now, it kind of works.  I can get relatively jitter-free floats and
occasionally fixes, but these fixes don't last long and I'm not sure they
are actually globally accurate (ie: if you restart the software, you may get
a fix, but it may be several meters from your last fix).  Sometimes a fix
goes away and never seems to come back.



I'm wondering if you guys have any suggestions to improve these results.

Better antennas? (Which ones?)

Trying to get better placement of the base station?

Different settings in rtknavi?

Continuous vs Fix and Hold?



Thanks!

-Sean





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss-gps/attachments/20140917/04981835/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 25680 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss-gps/attachments/20140917/04981835/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 29201 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss-gps/attachments/20140917/04981835/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 26117 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss-gps/attachments/20140917/04981835/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 19442 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss-gps/attachments/20140917/04981835/attachment-0003.png>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
FOSS-GPS mailing list
FOSS-GPS at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps

End of FOSS-GPS Digest, Vol 68, Issue 7
***************************************