[FOSS-GPS] RTKLIB/RTKPOS RTK Static question

Felipe G. Nievinski fgnievinski at gmail.com
Wed Sep 30 12:53:57 PDT 2015


Both .pos output files show ns=8,
which is the number of G sat in both .15o input files,
so it seems the remaining four R sat are not being used.
make sure the .15g input GLO nav is being loaded.
also try enabling more logging info to debug
why rtkplot is not using the GLO sat obs.
-F.

Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:50:56 +0100
> From: Ant?nio Pestana <afsm.pestana at gmail.com>
> To: Open Source GPS-related discussion and support
>         <foss-gps at lists.osgeo.org>
> Subject: [FOSS-GPS] RTKLIB/RTKPOS RTK Static question
> Message-ID:
>         <CACHwcgKbzZXYiY4GN=JJgu6Hdwh1+9koFs2nFxNUcxJxy=+
> LJQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hello all,
>
>
> I?ve been testing the use of RTKLIB/RTKPOST (all patches applied) for
> Static RTK, with or without GLONASS (I?m receiving signals from 6 to 8 GLO
> satellites). The hardware I?m using is exactly the same, both for rover and
> for reference. The baseline is 55 meters long.
>
>
> I?m collecting my observations at 20 Hz  using 10-minute span RINEX files.
> For carrier frequencies I?ve been using L1+L2 and ?fix-and-hold?
> ambiguities for GPS. After inspecting the positioning results I?ve got so
> far I?ve noticed that:
>
>
> 1. For GLO ambiguities, the same results are obtained either selecting ?ON?
> or selecting ?AUTO?.
>
> 2. Exactly the same results (up to the forth decimal!) are obtained
> regardless using GPS+GLONASS or GPS-only data.
>
>
> The behavior described in 1.  can be easily explained by recalling that the
> GNSS hardware I?m using is the same, both for reference and for rover.
>
>
> However the behavior described in 2. keeps puzzling me and that?s the
> reason why I?m asking for your help.
>
>
> One small data file is available at
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7204666/DataSample.zip
>
> containing RINEX sample data and the positioning results I?ve got when
> using that RINEX data sample.  Hope someone can help me.
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
> Ant?nio
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss-gps/attachments/20150930/e1045404/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> FOSS-GPS mailing list
> FOSS-GPS at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps
>
> End of FOSS-GPS Digest, Vol 80, Issue 15
> ****************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss-gps/attachments/20150930/00e2bcd6/attachment.html>


More information about the FOSS-GPS mailing list