[Foss4g2009] Re: FOSS4G Conference Presentations and an academic track

Shoaib Burq saburq at gmail.com
Fri May 29 10:18:47 EDT 2009


+1 Yea adding a field asking presenters if they would like to be
considered for inclusion in the academic track would make sense.
If they say yes we also need to add a blurb showing the deadlines for
submission as per:

http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2009_Call4papers

Then someone will have to chase up presenters if they miss a deadline

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Harley Prowse <HarleyP at geobiz.co.nz> wrote:
> All,
>
> I am getting enquiries from some who have already submitted abstracts as to how they can ensure their paper is considered for the academic track.
>
> We need to come up with a policy on this and this also raises an issue around how do we distinguish between normal and academic abstracts.  Hence I have added Volker to this email to get his thoughts on this.  Can we simply add a new field to the abstract page which is Academic (true/false).  Set all those that are already in their to false, and email them all to log back in to change it if they want.
>
> Or are we proposing a different abstract submission website for the academic abstracts?
>
> Regards
>
> Harley
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jorge Gustavo Rocha [mailto:jgr at di.uminho.pt]
> Sent: 26 May 2009 11:01 a.m.
> To: mapbutcher
> Cc: Thierry Badard; foss4g2009; Chris Rizos; Harley Prowse; conference_dev; Cameron Shorter; Abbas Rajabifard; Cameron Shorter; Linlin GE; shoaib
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Conf] Re:FOSS4G Conference Presentations and an academictrack
>
> Thanks, Simon.
>
> The allocation seems reasonable, with the academic track running all
> day, on Thursday, 22th. With 3 different sessions, we will try to keep
> related papers on the same session, with nice titles for each section.
>
> Related to the site update, I'll go around to identify things we can
> change to reflect the announcement of the academic track. I'll ask
> Thierry to help me with that, and we will send the suggestions with cc
> to Shoaib Burq.
>
> We need also someone to create a new mailing list for the scientific
> committee. We must have more people joining the committee, to help
> spread the word and have more people involved. When I need one for our
> local chapter, Lorenzo created it for me. If there is one
> “super-osgeo-user” reading this, please initiate a
> scientific-committee-2009 [@lists.osgeo.org]. If it no so easy, I can
> run one on our local chapter domain (but I would prefer one on
> lists.osgeo.org).
>
> Regards,
>
> Jorge
>
> Ter, 2009-05-26 às 06:19 +1000, mapbutcher escreveu:
>> Jorge,
>>
>>
>> See comments inline:
>>
>>         1) We should put together the academic presentations. It's
>>         more easy for
>>         attendees to decide in advance where they wanna go.
>>
>>
>> OK
>>
>>
>>
>>         2) We should accept only good papers, even if they are only a
>>         few. It's
>>         a investment in quality, that will help us to raise the EIC
>>         (Estimated
>>         Impact of Conference). But I would say that we could accept
>>         about 12 to
>>         15 papers, maximum.
>>
>>         3) It's no my business, but I might suggest just 20 min. to
>>         each
>>         academic presentation, instead of the 30 min. scheduled.
>>         Authors should
>>         really focus on what is really important, instead of telling
>>         all the
>>         story from the beginning till the end.
>>
>>
>> With 20 minutes each this fits in well with the current schedule
>> sessions. I have made a suggestion that the academic track runs all
>> day on Thursday 22nd in Parkside G04. Each session runs for 1hr and 30
>> minutes  - so in the academic track you'd have 4 presentations per
>> session with a 10 minute turn around allowance.
>>
>>
>> http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pm1bvJQodiW3WBYGU7MM0Og
>>
>>
>>
>> See the sheet for the 22nd. Is this room a suitable size. More
>> information on the room can be found here:
>>
>>
>> http://www.scec.com.au/rooms/fact_sheet.cfm?ObjectID=128
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         4) Joining items 2) and 3), tell us how many papers we should
>>         accept, to
>>         keep the schedule consistent, in your opinion. If you work on
>>         the
>>         google's schedule spreadsheet, we would see immediately your
>>         suggestions.
>>
>>
>> 12 presentations would be required if the above schedule is suitable
>>
>>
>>
>>         5) We should update FOSS4G website to reflect today's
>>         announcement.
>>         Please feel free to request more information to update the
>>         website. We
>>         can help you with the contents.
>>
>>
>> Agreed, I've cc'd Shoaib in. I think a new dedicated page under the
>> programme heading would be good - if you could provide the content to
>> Shoaib he can arrange the site update. I also think we need to update
>> the current presentation page and submission guide page to take into
>> account the academic track
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>>
>>         Regards,
>>
>>         Jorge
>>
>>         Seg, 2009-05-25 às 20:46 +1000, mapbutcher escreveu:
>>
>>         > Jorge,
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > With regard to the allocation of presentation slots in the
>>         > schedule. Would you like the presentations to be ran
>>         consecutively in
>>         > a single room where possible?
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > Cheers
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > Simon
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > 2009/5/22 Jorge Gustavo Rocha <jgr at di.uminho.pt>
>>         >         Hi all,
>>         >
>>         >         Thanks Paul. I'm interested to go forward [at full
>>         speed,
>>         >         since we don't
>>         >         have much time]. More people is necessary, so
>>         Thierry's offer
>>         >         is very
>>         >         welcome.
>>         >
>>         >         I think the next steps should be:
>>         >
>>         >         0) Write down the call for [scientific/research]
>>         papers, for
>>         >         the
>>         >         academic track (we can start with last year call)
>>         >
>>         >         1) Update FOSS4G 2009 web site, to announce the peer
>>         reviewed
>>         >         academic
>>         >         track, pointing to call for papers
>>         >                - Deadline for this track should be around
>>         July 31th;
>>         >                - Specific submission guidelines should be
>>         added to
>>         >         this track
>>         >                - The conference scheduled should be updated
>>         to have 3
>>         >         or 4 sessions
>>         >         with academic presentations (taking about 12 to 16
>>         slots of
>>         >         the 94
>>         >         available ones)
>>         >
>>         >         1.1) Cameron could prepare a press release to
>>         announce the
>>         >         call, and to
>>         >         get it posted to every mailing list
>>         >
>>         >         2) Create a representative scientific committee
>>         (this can
>>         >         start right
>>         >         now; some other members can be added later), by:
>>         >                - Inviting the members that previously act as
>>         >         scientific
>>         >         committee/reviewers
>>         >                - Inviting people from the Spanish chapter,
>>         that can do
>>         >         this job next
>>         >         year (maybe Lluís Vicens, from SITGA, Miguel R.
>>         Luaces, from
>>         >         Coruña
>>         >         Univ., Victor Olaya, from Extremadura Univ.)
>>         >                - Inviting Charlie Schweik, and someone else
>>         from the
>>         >         OSGeo-Edu
>>         >                - Inviting people from Australia
>>         >                - Inviting other known OSGeo chapter members,
>>         related
>>         >         to academic
>>         >         duties and research
>>         >                - Have some places for volunteers
>>         >         With 20 members on the scientific committee, if each
>>         can read
>>         >         10 papers,
>>         >         we can have 200 readings. So, if each paper is read
>>         by 3
>>         >         reviewers, we
>>         >         can receive 60-70 papers for reviewing.
>>         >
>>         >         3) Making all possible contacts with reputed
>>         journals/books,
>>         >         to start a
>>         >         reference publication related to OSGeo/FOSS4G.
>>         Thierry
>>         >         suggestion make
>>         >         sense; we can work with other institutions like ICA
>>         and alike
>>         >         to have
>>         >         the best possible printed publication, if we don't
>>         have enough
>>         >         high
>>         >         quality papers to create our own volume.
>>         >
>>         >         4) Install and configure an open source platform to
>>         handle the
>>         >         blind
>>         >         reviewing process (that's easy; OpenConf can be used
>>         for the
>>         >         job). The
>>         >         reviewing process will take place in August.
>>         >
>>         >         Right now, we need some feedback from Cameron and
>>         others to
>>         >         know the
>>         >         impact of this academic track in the current
>>         schedule. Is the
>>         >         July 31th
>>         >         deadline ok? 12 to 16 papers is reasonable?
>>         >
>>         >         Regards,
>>         >
>>         >         Jorge
>>         >         --
>>         >         jorge gustavo rocha
>>         >         departamento de informática
>>         >         universidade do minho
>>         >         4710-057 braga
>>         >         portugal
>>         >         N 41º33'44,5" W 8º23'40,5"
>>         >         tel +351 253604470 fax +351 253604471 cel +351
>>         927210173
>>         >
>>         >
>>         >         Qui, 2009-05-21 às 15:09 -0400, Thierry Badard
>>         escreveu:
>>         >         > Paul Ramsey a écrit :
>>         >         > > More than anything else, the Sydney team needs
>>         someone
>>         >         with an
>>         >         > > academic background to step up and take on the
>>         academic
>>         >         track:
>>         >         > >
>>         >         > > - organizing the peer review panel
>>         >         > > - selecting the publication mechanism
>>         >         > > - selecting the papers for the academic track
>>         >         > >
>>         >         > > In 2007 Tyler and members of the education
>>         committee did
>>         >         that for me,
>>         >         > > which was invaluable. In 2008, a member of the
>>         LOC was
>>         >         sufficiently
>>         >         > > academic to do it. For 2009, a volunteer from
>>         the academic
>>         >         community
>>         >         > > is needed. Us ordinary folk don't understand
>>         what makes a
>>         >         good process
>>         >         > > for this stuff, we need someone who does. Could
>>         that
>>         >         person be you,
>>         >         > > Jorge?
>>         >         > >
>>         >         > > P
>>         >         >
>>         >         > Hi all,
>>         >         >
>>         >         > If Jorge is interested in, I could take it in
>>         charge with
>>         >         him. I have
>>         >         > already been involved in lot of program or
>>         scientific
>>         >         committees and I
>>         >         > have also organised different scientific tracks,
>>         workshops
>>         >         or events. In
>>         >         > addition, as a co-chair of ICA WG on open source
>>         geospatial
>>         >         technologies
>>         >         >   (see http://ica-opensource.scg.ulaval.ca), I
>>         will be very
>>         >         happy to
>>         >         > engage a first effective collaboration between ICA
>>         and OSGeo
>>         >         around an
>>         >         > academic/scientific track with publication of
>>         selected
>>         >         papers as an
>>         >         > edited book.
>>         >         >
>>         >         > Cheers,
>>         >         >
>>         >         > Th.
>>         >         >
>>         >
>>         >
>>         >
>>         >
>>         >         _______________________________________________
>>         >         Conference_dev mailing list
>>         >         Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>         >
>>         http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>         >
>>         >
>>         >
>>
>>         --
>>
>>         jorge gustavo rocha
>>         departamento de informática
>>         universidade do minho
>>         4710-057 braga
>>         portugal
>>         N 41º33'44,5" W 8º23'40,5"
>>         tel +351 253604470 fax +351 253604471 cel +351 927210173
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> jorge gustavo rocha
> departamento de informática
> universidade do minho
> 4710-057 braga
> portugal
> N 41º33'44,5" W 8º23'40,5"
> tel +351 253604470 fax +351 253604471 cel +351 927210173
>
>
>
>


More information about the Foss4g2009 mailing list