[Foss4g2010] registration

[Lorenzo Becchi]

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Tyler Mitchell <tmitchell at osgeo.org> wrote:

> If Lorenzo wants to get registration open sooner than later, and can
> address the registration related questions Paul pointed out, then the
> board could do the full budget approval afterwards.
>
> Approving the budget will not alter registration costs I assume, so
> don't see any reason for holding up registrations while getting the
> more detailed clarity on the budget.
>

+1

Lorenzo



>
> Just a thought,
> Tyler
>
> On 12/15/09, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca> wrote:
> > There are questions outstanding on the list, from me:
> > --
> > * Clarification on the proposed prices (ones in the wiki page? or the
> > PDF budget?) would be good.
> > --
> > And from Tyler:
> > --
> > 1 - It took some digging to understand why the &quot;surplus per
> > registrant&quot;
> > changed, negatively, as the group grew larger.  Common sense would
> suggest a
> > larger surplus as the group grows even if just slightly.  It seems to be
> > under
> > estimating a bit, which is fine for the end result but is deceiving on
> the
> > surface.  For example, there are an increasing number of free pass
> > &quot;guests&quot; in
> > the equation - if they were shown in the registrations tables it would
> help
> > make this obvious.
> >
> > 2 - Also the calculated total registrants on page 4 is disproportionately
> > lower for the 1000 delegate scenario than for the others.  I think it's
> > supposed to be 950 instead of 836.
> >
> > 3 - Do we really expect to have 50 &quot;guests&quot; out of 1000
> > attendees?  I don't
> > know the answer, but am curious on the thought there.
> >
> > 4 - Typo on page 4 &quot;Full Registration before 15/06/2009&quot; -
> > should be 2010
> >
> > 5 - Can we get this down into a single working budget document?  Or is
> that
> > not important at this time?   Surely the working budget will not be
> > maintained
> > in 3 separate documents will it and that is what you're really looking
> for
> > right?
> >
> > Anything I'm mistaken about?  I hope I'm reading these right.
> > --
> > P.
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Lorenzo Becchi <lorenzo at ominiverdi.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >> thanks guys for the revision
> >>
> >> @Jeff any news from the board?
> >> can we open the doors?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Jeff McKenna
> >> <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for catching that Volker.
> >>>
> >>> -jeff
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Volker Mische wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> After a quick look at [1] I found:
> >>>> "To register online for the FOSS4G 2009 Conference please click here"
> >>>> But it's "FOSS4G 2010" already  :)
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>>  Volker
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Foss4g2010 mailing list
> >>> Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
> >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Foss4g2010 mailing list
> >> Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foss4g2010 mailing list
> > Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
> >
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile device
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss4g2010/attachments/20091216/9b77f1ad/attachment.html