[Foss4g2010] registration

[Paul Ramsey]

To re-state the question: are the final admission rates the ones in
the budget or the wiki? I assume the budget but as long as there's two
sources of info some confusion is inevitable.

P

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Lorenzo Becchi <lorenzo at ominiverdi.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Tyler Mitchell <tmitchell at osgeo.org> wrote:
>>
>> If Lorenzo wants to get registration open sooner than later, and can
>> address the registration related questions Paul pointed out, then the
>> board could do the full budget approval afterwards.
>>
>> Approving the budget will not alter registration costs I assume, so
>> don't see any reason for holding up registrations while getting the
>> more detailed clarity on the budget.
>
> +1
>
> Lorenzo
>
>
>>
>> Just a thought,
>> Tyler
>>
>> On 12/15/09, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca> wrote:
>> > There are questions outstanding on the list, from me:
>> > --
>> > * Clarification on the proposed prices (ones in the wiki page? or the
>> > PDF budget?) would be good.
>> > --
>> > And from Tyler:
>> > --
>> > 1 - It took some digging to understand why the &quot;surplus per
>> > registrant&quot;
>> > changed, negatively, as the group grew larger.  Common sense would
>> > suggest a
>> > larger surplus as the group grows even if just slightly.  It seems to be
>> > under
>> > estimating a bit, which is fine for the end result but is deceiving on
>> > the
>> > surface.  For example, there are an increasing number of free pass
>> > &quot;guests&quot; in
>> > the equation - if they were shown in the registrations tables it would
>> > help
>> > make this obvious.
>> >
>> > 2 - Also the calculated total registrants on page 4 is
>> > disproportionately
>> > lower for the 1000 delegate scenario than for the others.  I think it's
>> > supposed to be 950 instead of 836.
>> >
>> > 3 - Do we really expect to have 50 &quot;guests&quot; out of 1000
>> > attendees?  I don't
>> > know the answer, but am curious on the thought there.
>> >
>> > 4 - Typo on page 4 &quot;Full Registration before 15/06/2009&quot; -
>> > should be 2010
>> >
>> > 5 - Can we get this down into a single working budget document?  Or is
>> > that
>> > not important at this time?   Surely the working budget will not be
>> > maintained
>> > in 3 separate documents will it and that is what you're really looking
>> > for
>> > right?
>> >
>> > Anything I'm mistaken about?  I hope I'm reading these right.
>> > --
>> > P.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Lorenzo Becchi
>> > <lorenzo at ominiverdi.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> thanks guys for the revision
>> >>
>> >> @Jeff any news from the board?
>> >> can we open the doors?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Jeff McKenna
>> >> <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks for catching that Volker.
>> >>>
>> >>> -jeff
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Volker Mische wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> After a quick look at [1] I found:
>> >>>> "To register online for the FOSS4G 2009 Conference please click here"
>> >>>> But it's "FOSS4G 2010" already  :)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Cheers,
>> >>>>  Volker
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Foss4g2010 mailing list
>> >>> Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
>> >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Foss4g2010 mailing list
>> >> Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
>> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
>> >>
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Foss4g2010 mailing list
>> > Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
>> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Sent from my mobile device
>>
>
>