[Foss4g2010] registration

[Lorenzo Becchi]

budget

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca>wrote:

> To re-state the question: are the final admission rates the ones in
> the budget or the wiki? I assume the budget but as long as there's two
> sources of info some confusion is inevitable.
>
> P
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Lorenzo Becchi <lorenzo at ominiverdi.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Tyler Mitchell <tmitchell at osgeo.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> If Lorenzo wants to get registration open sooner than later, and can
> >> address the registration related questions Paul pointed out, then the
> >> board could do the full budget approval afterwards.
> >>
> >> Approving the budget will not alter registration costs I assume, so
> >> don't see any reason for holding up registrations while getting the
> >> more detailed clarity on the budget.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Lorenzo
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Just a thought,
> >> Tyler
> >>
> >> On 12/15/09, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca> wrote:
> >> > There are questions outstanding on the list, from me:
> >> > --
> >> > * Clarification on the proposed prices (ones in the wiki page? or the
> >> > PDF budget?) would be good.
> >> > --
> >> > And from Tyler:
> >> > --
> >> > 1 - It took some digging to understand why the &quot;surplus per
> >> > registrant&quot;
> >> > changed, negatively, as the group grew larger.  Common sense would
> >> > suggest a
> >> > larger surplus as the group grows even if just slightly.  It seems to
> be
> >> > under
> >> > estimating a bit, which is fine for the end result but is deceiving on
> >> > the
> >> > surface.  For example, there are an increasing number of free pass
> >> > &quot;guests&quot; in
> >> > the equation - if they were shown in the registrations tables it would
> >> > help
> >> > make this obvious.
> >> >
> >> > 2 - Also the calculated total registrants on page 4 is
> >> > disproportionately
> >> > lower for the 1000 delegate scenario than for the others.  I think
> it's
> >> > supposed to be 950 instead of 836.
> >> >
> >> > 3 - Do we really expect to have 50 &quot;guests&quot; out of 1000
> >> > attendees?  I don't
> >> > know the answer, but am curious on the thought there.
> >> >
> >> > 4 - Typo on page 4 &quot;Full Registration before 15/06/2009&quot; -
> >> > should be 2010
> >> >
> >> > 5 - Can we get this down into a single working budget document?  Or is
> >> > that
> >> > not important at this time?   Surely the working budget will not be
> >> > maintained
> >> > in 3 separate documents will it and that is what you're really looking
> >> > for
> >> > right?
> >> >
> >> > Anything I'm mistaken about?  I hope I'm reading these right.
> >> > --
> >> > P.
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Lorenzo Becchi
> >> > <lorenzo at ominiverdi.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> thanks guys for the revision
> >> >>
> >> >> @Jeff any news from the board?
> >> >> can we open the doors?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Jeff McKenna
> >> >> <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks for catching that Volker.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> -jeff
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Volker Mische wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> After a quick look at [1] I found:
> >> >>>> "To register online for the FOSS4G 2009 Conference please click
> here"
> >> >>>> But it's "FOSS4G 2010" already  :)
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Cheers,
> >> >>>>  Volker
> >> >>>
> >> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> Foss4g2010 mailing list
> >> >>> Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
> >> >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Foss4g2010 mailing list
> >> >> Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
> >> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Foss4g2010 mailing list
> >> > Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
> >> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent from my mobile device
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss4g2010/attachments/20091217/df71be1e/attachment.html