[Foss4g2010] Sponsorship Prospectus [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Raj Singh rsingh at opengeospatial.org
Tue Nov 24 18:12:41 EST 2009


Yes I agree. That makes the most sense.


---
Raj

On Nov 24, 2009, at 3:57 PM, Lorenzo Becchi <lorenzo at ominiverdi.com>  
wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Arnulf Christl (OSGeo) <arnulf at osgeo.org 
> > wrote:
> All,
> having the OGC at FOSS4G in my opinion is a must. But they can  
> probably cater for themselves when it comes to funding. Ideally the  
> Sponsorship Prospectus will reference that the OGC participates at  
> FOSS4G but not specify a separate sponsorship address for them.  
> Makes sense?
>
> well explained
> thx
>
> lorenzo
>
>
> Best regards,
> Arnulf.
>
> Lorenzo Becchi wrote:
> hi Bruce and Raj,
> I personally consider an honour to have the CCIP event inside  
> FOSS4G2010.
> I consider it a strategic event for both OGC and OSGeo.
> In this moment I need to publish the Sponsorship Prospectus and  
> would like to know what make sense to write into it.
> Please, tell me if you still want to be part of FOSS4G. doors are  
> open for you.
> If you want to participate, I agree about having two different lines  
> of sponsorship. It makes poor sense to me to collect money for OGC.  
> Please provide, ASAP, a text that introduce CCIP 2010 and how  
> sponsors can support it.
>
> do you still need somebody from the spanish meteo?
>
> thanks
> lorenzo
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Raj Singh  
> <rsingh at opengeospatial.org <mailto:rsingh at opengeospatial.org>> wrote:
>
>    Just to add some detail to the conversation. Bruce and I discussed
>    that even if we didn't make CCIP an *integral* part of FOSS4G2010,
>    we would still advocate for OGC and open source CCIP 2010
>    participants to highlight their CCIP 2010 work in FOSS4G 2010
>    workshops, presentations, and booths.
>
>    ---
>    Raj
>
>
>
>    On Nov 23, at 6:34 PM, Bruce Bannerman wrote:
>
>
>        Tyler, Lorenzo and all,
>
>        I'm sensing some reluctance to have a CCIP type of event at  
> FOSS4G.
>
>        Raj and I discussed this issue this morning and feel that we  
> don't
>        want to force this event on the FOSS4G community. We want to
>        maintain
>        good relations.
>
>        We will begin making contingency plans and look at alternate  
> events
>        that we could run a CCIP type of event at.
>
>        GSDI-12 is one possible alternative. It is also perhaps a  
> better fit
>        for the ideals of the event.
>
>
>        Bruce
>
>
>
>
>
>            -----Original Message-----
>            From: foss4g2010-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>            <mailto:foss4g2010-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>
>            [mailto:foss4g2010-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>            <mailto:foss4g2010-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>] On Behalf Of
>            Bruce Bannerman
>            Sent: Saturday, 21 November 2009 10:58 AM
>            To: tmitchell at osgeo.org <mailto:tmitchell at osgeo.org>
>            Cc: 'foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
>            <mailto:foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org>'; raj at rajsingh.org
>            <mailto:raj at rajsingh.org>
>
>            Subject: RE: [Foss4g2010] Sponsorship Prospectus
>            [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
>            G'day Tyler,
>
>            I will put something together as soon as we're able.
>
>            I have a call with Raj on Tuesday where we will discuss the
>            best way to answer this. We will be preempting CCIP  
> community
>            discussion. Let me know if you need more than this email in
>            the short term.
>
>            Suffice to say that we aim to have a much more structured
>            project approach to the 2010 event, with more time for
>            planning and project delivery. I would ideally like to  
> have a
>            one day stream at FOSS4G-2010 dedicated to CCIP-2010 where
>            participants could expose their work in more detail. We  
> have
>            yet to have this conversation with both communities though.
>            We are also aiming for significantly higher sponsorship  
> dollars.
>
>            CCIP would bring in more revenue to FOSS4G in participants
>            alone, exposing (some) to FOSS4G perhaps for the first  
> time.
>            It will also bring in revenue from Conference facilities  
> etc.
>            There will also be a great additional stream of marketing  
> for
>            FOSS4G-2010.
>
>            Strategically, FOSS4G will be seen as great community
>            partners of OGC and in doing something positive in the
>            Climate arena to try and make systems interoperable  and to
>            help ensure that the real 'numbers' are available for
>            scrutiny via open standards.
>
>            I anticipate that the lessons learned will come out of the
>            SWOT analysis.
>
>
>            One thing that we would like to pursue with greater vigour
>            this year is to how to get greater Open Source spatial
>            participation in the event.
>
>            One idea that I'm pursuing is the idea of CCIP Participant
>            partnerships between science communities and spatial
>            communities / vendors. We should be able to achieve this if
>            we target the scenarios right. This may give OS Communities
>            the opportunity to get involved via a 'science' sponsor,
>            perhaps an organisation like my own.
>
>            Anyway, these are preliminary thoughts that need to be  
> worked
>            through with the relevant communities.
>
>
>
>            Bruce
>
>
>            ________________________________________
>            From: Tyler Mitchell [tmitchell.osgeo at shaw.ca
>            <mailto:tmitchell.osgeo at shaw.ca>]
>
>            Sent: Saturday, 21 November 2009 4:21 AM
>            To: Bruce Bannerman
>            Cc: 'foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
>            <mailto:foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org>'
>
>            Subject: Re: [Foss4g2010] Sponsorship Prospectus
>            [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
>            Hi Bruce, glad to here you've recovered enough ;)
>
>            For me the CCIP process was a bit opaque - could you give
>            Lorenzo and the rest of us an overview on the main  
> benefit of
>            running the process?  e.g. how did it add value to the  
> FOSS4G
>            event - both subjectively and financially.  And how much  
> work
>            did it require from someone on the LOC?
>
>            Also, do you have any sort of "lessons learned" compiled
>            anywhere?
>
>            Thanks!  G'day,
>            Tyler
>
>            ----- Original Message -----
>            From: Bruce Bannerman <B.Bannerman at bom.gov.au
>            <mailto:B.Bannerman at bom.gov.au>>
>            Date: Thursday, November 19, 2009 4:03 pm
>            Subject: [Foss4g2010] Sponsorship Prospectus  
> [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>            To: "'foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
>            <mailto:foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org>'"
>            <foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org 
> >>
>
>                Lorenzo,
>
>
>                    hi all,
>                    we've been revisiting the contents of the  
> prospectus.
>                    We've set up prices and other details.
>
>                    there's still a couple of things, mostly about  
> refining
>
>                contents and using
>
>                    proper English, that should be done.
>
>                    we invite you all to contribute, in the wiki or in
>                    this list.
>
>                    the revision time will be until next monday then
>                    we'll pass
>
>                the content to
>
>                    the designer for the final layout.
>
>                    here's the content of the prospectus:
>
>
>            http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2010_Sponsorship_and_Exhibitor_Prosp
>
>                ectus>
>
>                    Lorenzo
>
>
>                I've had a quick look at the Prospectus.
>
>                For CCIP-2009, we found that trying to get CCIP
>                sponsorship for
>                participants via the Conference Organiser and also OGC
>
>            didn't work and
>
>                was just plain confusing for potential participants.
>
>                The FOSS4G CCIP sponsorship package offered very  
> little to
>
>            potential
>
>                sponsors.
>
>
>                In the end, we assigned the responsibility for  
> obtaining
>
>            sponsorship
>
>                dollars to the OGC.
>
>
>                The money that the OGC raised helped run the CCIP  
> project.
>
>                A substantial portion of the major CCIP Sponsor's  
> funding
>
>            came back to
>
>                FOSS4G for booth, conference etc fees.
>
>                I can give you these figures off line.
>
>
>                In short, I'd leave the CCIP sponsorship arrangements  
> with
>
>            the OGC and
>
>                negotiate suitable costs depending on CCIP-2010
>                requirements.
>
>
>                I'd say that you will be getting people attending
>
>            FOSS4G-2010 just to
>
>                see the results of CCIP-2010. We will need to ensure  
> that
>
>            there is a
>
>                definite programe of interest presented. So there  
> will be
>
>            additional
>
>                return there as well.
>
>
>                Bruce
>                _______________________________________________
>                Foss4g2010 mailing list
>                Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
>                <mailto:Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org>
>
>                http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
>
>            _______________________________________________
>            Foss4g2010 mailing list
>            Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org 
> >
>
>            http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
>
>
>    _______________________________________________
>    Foss4g2010 mailing list
>    Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org>
>
>    http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
>
>
>
> --- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foss4g2010 mailing list
> Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
>
>
> -- 
> Arnulf Christl
> President OSGeo
> http://www.osgeo.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss4g2010/attachments/20091124/1a905ad1/attachment-0001.html


More information about the Foss4g2010 mailing list