[Foss4g2010] Re: General track Abstract selection

[Judit Mays]

Hello dear conference organisers,

catching up on the abstract selection: what has been decided for how the
selection process for general track shall work?

Now that submission deadline has passed is there a vote going on
somewhere? Who is taking part?

Kind regards,
Judit



Lluís Vicens schrieb:
> Hi Volker and Cameron,
> 
> Next Monday we have a meeting in Barcelona. We will discuss about this
> issue and i will let you know our thoughts and decision. BTW, could you
> explain us a little bit more about your script and how it could be
> implemented before April 15th?
> 
> Cheers,
> Lluís
> 
> 
> En/na Volker Mische ha escrit:
>> I should have written the "why" more explicitly. People don't (or less
>> likely) complain when they know somebody put some thoughts in Abstract
>> selection and that it wasn't just two buddy's making it out while having
>> a beer.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>   Volker
>>
>> Volker Mische wrote:
>>   
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> is there already information about the Abstract selection of the general
>>> (non-academic) track available? The point of this mail is not to discuss
>>> how the selection should be, but rather that it should be transparent
>>> how the selection process works. I don't mean that it needs to be
>>> transparent why someone was rejected, but only how the process was that
>>> lead to the rejection.
>>>
>>> I hope my intent was roughly understandable. And some people might even
>>> understand why I think that this process needs to be transparent :)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>   Volker
>>>
>>>     

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss4g2010/attachments/20100419/424fdc8b/signature.bin