[Foss4g2010] Community Program Review

[Óscar Fonts]

Vasile,

Add it in the wiki as 'lessons learned' for next years conferences. :)



El 07/05/2010, a las 8:31, Vasile Craciunescu <vasile.craciunescu at gmail.com 
 > escribió:

> I agree with you. It's good to know even for posters witch are the  
> most interesting titles from attendances perspective. Anyway, for  
> practical reasons, I think the two categories of abstracts should be  
> somehow differentiated (or placed on different pages). For example,  
> on the review page, the voters are asked to vote for a reasonable  
> number of titles. This is a good thing for oral presentations, where  
> you have a psychical limit in the number of presentations a  
> participant can attend, but this limit don't apply to posters, where  
> a participant can see all the presentations during the breaks.
>
> Vasile
>
> Lorenzo Becchi wrote:
>> it is anyway important to us to know which are the most interesting
>> abstract.
>> We are planning special treatments for the most populars.
>> lorenzo
>> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca 
>> >wrote:
>>> The abstract database I was given didn't distinguish between
>>> submission types. I agree that it would be good to not have rankers
>>> also wade through poster abstracts. If I can get a list of abstract
>>> identifiers for poster submissions, I can hide those from the list  
>>> of
>>> abstracts people are shown.
>>>
>>> P
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Vasile Craciunescu
>>> <vasile.craciunescu at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> The Community Program Review page is truly great. Only one thing  
>>>> confuses
>>>> me. It seems that the abstracts for poster are mixed with  
>>>> abstracts for
>>> oral
>>>> presentation. I'm confused because there is no sign of distinction
>>> between
>>>> this two type of proposals. On the other hand, the poster section  
>>>> on
>>>> FOSS4G2010 website (http://2010.foss4g.org/presentations_posters.php 
>>>> )
>>> says:
>>>> "Acceptance: Posters will be accepted "first come, first served"  
>>>> until
>>> there
>>>> is no more room or the deadline passes."
>>>>
>>>> If so, what's the point in evaluating the poster proposal?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Vasile
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Foss4g2010 mailing list
>>>> Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Foss4g2010 mailing list
>>> Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
>>>
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Foss4g2010 mailing list
> Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010