[Foss4g2010] Community Program Review

[Vasile Craciunescu]

I agree with you. It's good to know even for posters witch are the most 
interesting titles from attendances perspective. Anyway, for practical 
reasons, I think the two categories of abstracts should be somehow 
differentiated (or placed on different pages). For example, on the 
review page, the voters are asked to vote for a reasonable number of 
titles. This is a good thing for oral presentations, where you have a 
psychical limit in the number of presentations a participant can attend, 
but this limit don't apply to posters, where a participant can see all 
the presentations during the breaks.

Vasile

Lorenzo Becchi wrote:
> it is anyway important to us to know which are the most interesting
> abstract.
> We are planning special treatments for the most populars.
> 
> lorenzo
> 
> 
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca>wrote:
> 
>> The abstract database I was given didn't distinguish between
>> submission types. I agree that it would be good to not have rankers
>> also wade through poster abstracts. If I can get a list of abstract
>> identifiers for poster submissions, I can hide those from the list of
>> abstracts people are shown.
>>
>> P
>>
>> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Vasile Craciunescu
>> <vasile.craciunescu at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> The Community Program Review page is truly great. Only one thing confuses
>>> me. It seems that the abstracts for poster are mixed with abstracts for
>> oral
>>> presentation. I'm confused because there is no sign of distinction
>> between
>>> this two type of proposals. On the other hand, the poster section on
>>> FOSS4G2010 website (http://2010.foss4g.org/presentations_posters.php)
>> says:
>>> "Acceptance: Posters will be accepted "first come, first served" until
>> there
>>> is no more room or the deadline passes."
>>>
>>> If so, what's the point in evaluating the poster proposal?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Vasile
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Foss4g2010 mailing list
>>> Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Foss4g2010 mailing list
>> Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
>>
>>
>