[Foss4g2010] Community Program Review

[Lorenzo Becchi]

it is anyway important to us to know which are the most interesting
abstract.
We are planning special treatments for the most populars.

lorenzo


On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca>wrote:

> The abstract database I was given didn't distinguish between
> submission types. I agree that it would be good to not have rankers
> also wade through poster abstracts. If I can get a list of abstract
> identifiers for poster submissions, I can hide those from the list of
> abstracts people are shown.
>
> P
>
> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Vasile Craciunescu
> <vasile.craciunescu at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > The Community Program Review page is truly great. Only one thing confuses
> > me. It seems that the abstracts for poster are mixed with abstracts for
> oral
> > presentation. I'm confused because there is no sign of distinction
> between
> > this two type of proposals. On the other hand, the poster section on
> > FOSS4G2010 website (http://2010.foss4g.org/presentations_posters.php)
> says:
> >
> > "Acceptance: Posters will be accepted "first come, first served" until
> there
> > is no more room or the deadline passes."
> >
> > If so, what's the point in evaluating the poster proposal?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Vasile
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foss4g2010 mailing list
> > Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Foss4g2010 mailing list
> Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss4g2010/attachments/20100504/89901bb8/attachment.html