[Foss4g2010] Community Program Review
Paul Ramsey
pramsey at cleverelephant.ca
Sun May 2 18:39:10 EDT 2010
The abstract database I was given didn't distinguish between
submission types. I agree that it would be good to not have rankers
also wade through poster abstracts. If I can get a list of abstract
identifiers for poster submissions, I can hide those from the list of
abstracts people are shown.
P
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Vasile Craciunescu
<vasile.craciunescu at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The Community Program Review page is truly great. Only one thing confuses
> me. It seems that the abstracts for poster are mixed with abstracts for oral
> presentation. I'm confused because there is no sign of distinction between
> this two type of proposals. On the other hand, the poster section on
> FOSS4G2010 website (http://2010.foss4g.org/presentations_posters.php) says:
>
> "Acceptance: Posters will be accepted "first come, first served" until there
> is no more room or the deadline passes."
>
> If so, what's the point in evaluating the poster proposal?
>
> Cheers,
> Vasile
> _______________________________________________
> Foss4g2010 mailing list
> Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
>
More information about the Foss4g2010
mailing list