[FOSS4G2016] [Program] Call for Presentations draft

[till.adams at fossgis.de]

Hi,

regarding the "Call for Paper and "AT" (and also worksohps) I agree: 
One single announcement which covers all might be useful for the start. 
Perhaps to be discussed later on IRC.

@Codrina - to your points:
2. - We want to establish the key topics by today. See here:
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/2016_Key_Topics

For me the 4 named (at the end there is still CMS, but I do not see any 
move in here) look quite interesting and fit well together.

See (read) you later!
Till


Am 2016-01-07 10:04, schrieb Codrina Maria Ilie:
> Good morning,
>
> Yes, I saw the mention. My point was that even if It is a distinct
> track with different reviewing committee amd such, should it be  be
> left just as a mention of its call even in the first announcement.
>
> Cheers,
> Codrina
>
> Trimis de pe iPhone-ul meu
>
> Pe 7 ian. 2016, la 00:41, Franz-Josef Behr
> <franz-josef.behr at hft-stuttgart.de> a scris:
>
>> Thanks, Codrina, for your suggestions!
>>
>> Regarding the Academic Track I found:
>>
>> Please note: there is a separate call for submissions of full papers 
>> for peer-review and academic publication in our Academic Presentation 
>> process (see the Academic Track CFP page: TODO FILL OUT THE PROPER 
>> LINK).
>>
>> The AT people like me have to provide their Call for Papers (which I 
>> will do tomorrow).
>>
>> Regards - Franz-Josef
>>
>>
>>
>>> Am 06.01.2016 um 23:23 schrieb Codrina Maria Ilie:
>>> Hi Volker, all,
>>>
>>> Great for making the wheel spin!
>>>
>>> Here are my 2c:
>>>
>>> 1. We need to change 2015 with 2016 :)
>>>
>>> 2. Are this year's topics established? I am sorry to have missed 
>>> that. :(  I think that when sending out the call for papers it is 
>>> essential that we consider (write about) the "side tracks" such as 
>>> the open data or remote sensing, if, in the end that will be the 
>>> case. I am talking here of explicitly pointing out our openness 
>>> towards whatever other adjacent communities we choose to engage with 
>>> and let that be heard. We did say we are building bridges, right? :) 
>>> I can see that the academic track is sided completely. Is that the 
>>> way it has been always done? I know it is traditionally separated, 
>>> but even in the very first announcement?
>>>
>>> I am thinking that maybe, this year, we could change the format of 
>>> our call for papers, just a little bit, considering that, as you 
>>> said, usually it is the same. All the information, of course, will be 
>>> delivered, but maybe in a softer way.
>>>
>>> What say you?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Codrina
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 06/01/16 20:09, Volker Mische wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I've created a draft for the Call for Presentations website at 
>>>> [1].
>>>> Please have a look. It's basically a copy&paste for the previous 
>>>> FOSS4Gs.
>>>>
>>>> [1]: 
>>>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2016_Call_for_Presentations_Website
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>  Volker
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> FOSS4G2016 mailing list
>>>> FOSS4G2016 at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2016
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> FOSS4G2016 mailing list
>>> FOSS4G2016 at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2016
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FOSS4G2016 mailing list
>> FOSS4G2016 at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2016
> _______________________________________________
> FOSS4G2016 mailing list
> FOSS4G2016 at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2016