[FOSS4G2016] FYI: Submitted Talks

[Codrina Maria Ilie]

Great! and..expected :D

I am not sure that to be evenly divided is very important. I expected a 
significant number to be related to the general topics of foss4g. I 
think it would be good to have a sufficient number of to complete a 
round of talks/topics, number which I think it's 8..or something.

We had an irc meeting tonight?..

Regards,
Codrina

On 21/03/16 13:20, Marc Vloemans wrote:
> Great Till
>
> Although it seems succesful...are we still on for IRC at 18.00 tonight?
>
> I guess what matters is that the papers proposed are somewhat evenly divided over all tracks/topics ?!?!
> Is that the case or do we need to slim down some tracks based on a lack of entries?
>
> Vriendelijke groet,
> Marc Vloemans
>
>
>
>
> Vriendelijke groet,
> Marc Vloemans
>
>> Op 21 mrt. 2016 om 12:09 heeft till.adams at fossgis.de het volgende geschreven:
>>
>> Hi LOC!
>>
>> I very excited track the rising number of submitted talks! Yesterday morning we had 122, evening there were 152 and now we actually rised up to 178. More disappointing seems to me the number of submitted talks for the Scientific Track. Yesterday there have been around 10. Perhaps the obstacle to hand in a cmplete paper was too hogh?
>>
>> Now we have also 37 workshops, but maybe some of them are not suitable as a workshop really.
>>
>> BTW. Writing this email, we now have 182 ;-)
>>
>> Till
>> _______________________________________________
>> FOSS4G2016 mailing list
>> FOSS4G2016 at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2016
> _______________________________________________
> FOSS4G2016 mailing list
> FOSS4G2016 at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2016
>