[FOSS4G2016] FYI: Submitted Talks

[Marc Vloemans]

Till

Of course I have kept 1800 in the agenda :-)
Although the main topic (if there were insufficient entries) of the agenda is not-that-apparently addressed. 

Now, if the division turns out to be very uneven accros the tracks it is wise to consider extending the deadline specifically for those topics or such like.
As you may imagine.
 A quick feed back from ProgComm and the MarkCom can get a quick action going.....

Vriendelijke groet,
Marc Vloemans


> Op 21 mrt. 2016 om 12:56 heeft till.adams at fossgis.de het volgende geschreven:
> 
> Marc,
> 
> we definetely meet today at 18h on IRC ;-).
> 
> Regarding the mentioned evenly divided proposals - I think that's quite normal and it's work of the ProgComm to deal with that and put that together in a senseful manner.
> 
> So that's a point I would definitely not talk about today. I had a phonecall with Volker some minutes ago and showed him all the possibilities they (ProgComm) have. Reducing is one possibility. Also, before anything happens from ProgComm side, there will be the community voting first.... ;-)
> 
> Till
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Am 2016-03-21 12:20, schrieb Marc Vloemans:
>> Great Till
>> 
>> Although it seems succesful...are we still on for IRC at 18.00 tonight?
>> 
>> I guess what matters is that the papers proposed are somewhat evenly
>> divided over all tracks/topics ?!?!
>> Is that the case or do we need to slim down some tracks based on a
>> lack of entries?
>> 
>> Vriendelijke groet,
>> Marc Vloemans
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Vriendelijke groet,
>> Marc Vloemans
>> 
>>> Op 21 mrt. 2016 om 12:09 heeft till.adams at fossgis.de het volgende geschreven:
>>> 
>>> Hi LOC!
>>> 
>>> I very excited track the rising number of submitted talks! Yesterday morning we had 122, evening there were 152 and now we actually rised up to 178. More disappointing seems to me the number of submitted talks for the Scientific Track. Yesterday there have been around 10. Perhaps the obstacle to hand in a cmplete paper was too hogh?
>>> 
>>> Now we have also 37 workshops, but maybe some of them are not suitable as a workshop really.
>>> 
>>> BTW. Writing this email, we now have 182 ;-)
>>> 
>>> Till
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> FOSS4G2016 mailing list
>>> FOSS4G2016 at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2016
>