[FOSS4G2016] [Program] Review system is ready

[Volker Mische]

Hi Johan,

thanks. I just found out that canceled proposals also show up in the
list. I'll fix it.

Cheers,
  Volker

On 03/23/2016 10:53 AM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> Volker,
> 
> I notice some double submissions:
> 090-262 mastering security with geoserver and geofence
> 098-280 Getting complex feature with geoserver and hale
> 101-277 Geoserver in production, we do it, here is how
> 091-272 Raster data in geoserver
> 097-279 Mapping the world beyond web mercator with geoserver
> 
> and one
> 
> 024 delete
> 
> Which wants to be deleted.
> Perhaps this can be cleaned up before voting (perhaps they have not
> used co-authors correctly, or the review system is showing them twice
> if they have)? Or maybe we should vote only for the submission with
> the lowest ID?
> 
> Kind Regards,
> Johan
> 
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Volker Mische <volker.mische at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Gert-Jan,
>>
>> this is for the Program Committee members. But of course anyone from the
>> LOC can join (that was also the case in the past, where actually the
>> Program Committee was mostly LOC only).
>>
>> The community vote is anonymous and will start next week.
>>
>> The difference between the Program Committee review and the community
>> vote is, that if you're part of the Program Committee you will also take
>> part in the final selection and not doing a simple vote only.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>   Volker
>>
>> On 03/23/2016 10:31 AM, Gert-Jan van der Weijden (OSGeo.nl) wrote:
>>> Hi Volker,
>>>
>>> I bit confused: I suppose this e-mail is intended for the
>>> non-LOC-members who registered themselves as members of the
>>> program-committee.
>>> And thus, not for the LOC-members?
>>>
>>> I guess I miss the point how the roles of program committee, LOC and
>>> community vote fit together.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> GJ
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Volker Mische schreef op 23-03-2016 9:36:
>>>> Hi Program-Committee
>>>>
>>>> for all of you that have already sent me their usernames, the review
>>>> system is ready now. For all that haven't sent me their names yet,
>>>> please do, as now the real work starts :)
>>>>
>>>> You should now have a "Reviews" section in your dashboard (in case you
>>>> don't see that let me know). You can select all talks, the ones you've
>>>> already reviewed and the onces you haven't.
>>>>
>>>> When you click on a talk, you'll see the abstract and additional
>>>> information. You can then vote on it, that's all that's needed. One you
>>>> hit "submit" it will show the next abstract in the list, this should
>>>> make the review as fast as possible with as little clicks as possible.
>>>> If you come across your own proposals, please don't vote on them :)
>>>>
>>>> You can also leave a message (you don't have to) that can then be used
>>>> by the committee for the final selection. My intention is that you don't
>>>> give a full review, but just some notes that might be useful for the
>>>> final selection process. It's for things like "I don't think that is
>>>> open source" or "This sounds very similar to xyz" or to make you
>>>> remember details that you want to share at the final selection. So use
>>>> it sparsely as it will make the spreadsheet we do the final selection on
>>>> only bigger ;)
>>>>
>>>> The deadline for the reviews is 2016-04-11. So please start early (in
>>>> case the system has bugs) so that you really have the time to get
>>>> through all the abstracts (which would be ideal).
>>>>
>>>> In case you wonder about the ordering. It is randomly ordered, but it's
>>>> the same every time you look at it. That's just a simple way to reduce
>>>> the bias a bit as all of us will have a different order.
>>>>
>>>> If you've any questions or find bugs or usability issues, please let me
>>>> know.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>   Volker
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> FOSS4G2016 mailing list
>>>> FOSS4G2016 at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2016
>> _______________________________________________
>> FOSS4G2016 mailing list
>> FOSS4G2016 at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2016