[FOSS4G2016] [Program] Review system is ready

[Volker Mische]

Hi Johan,

it should be fixed now. After a reload those duplicates should be gone.

Cheers,
  Volker

On 03/23/2016 11:09 AM, Volker Mische wrote:
> Hi Johan,
> 
> thanks. I just found out that canceled proposals also show up in the
> list. I'll fix it.
> 
> Cheers,
>   Volker
> 
> On 03/23/2016 10:53 AM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
>> Volker,
>>
>> I notice some double submissions:
>> 090-262 mastering security with geoserver and geofence
>> 098-280 Getting complex feature with geoserver and hale
>> 101-277 Geoserver in production, we do it, here is how
>> 091-272 Raster data in geoserver
>> 097-279 Mapping the world beyond web mercator with geoserver
>>
>> and one
>>
>> 024 delete
>>
>> Which wants to be deleted.
>> Perhaps this can be cleaned up before voting (perhaps they have not
>> used co-authors correctly, or the review system is showing them twice
>> if they have)? Or maybe we should vote only for the submission with
>> the lowest ID?
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Johan
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Volker Mische <volker.mische at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Gert-Jan,
>>>
>>> this is for the Program Committee members. But of course anyone from the
>>> LOC can join (that was also the case in the past, where actually the
>>> Program Committee was mostly LOC only).
>>>
>>> The community vote is anonymous and will start next week.
>>>
>>> The difference between the Program Committee review and the community
>>> vote is, that if you're part of the Program Committee you will also take
>>> part in the final selection and not doing a simple vote only.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>   Volker
>>>
>>> On 03/23/2016 10:31 AM, Gert-Jan van der Weijden (OSGeo.nl) wrote:
>>>> Hi Volker,
>>>>
>>>> I bit confused: I suppose this e-mail is intended for the
>>>> non-LOC-members who registered themselves as members of the
>>>> program-committee.
>>>> And thus, not for the LOC-members?
>>>>
>>>> I guess I miss the point how the roles of program committee, LOC and
>>>> community vote fit together.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> GJ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Volker Mische schreef op 23-03-2016 9:36:
>>>>> Hi Program-Committee
>>>>>
>>>>> for all of you that have already sent me their usernames, the review
>>>>> system is ready now. For all that haven't sent me their names yet,
>>>>> please do, as now the real work starts :)
>>>>>
>>>>> You should now have a "Reviews" section in your dashboard (in case you
>>>>> don't see that let me know). You can select all talks, the ones you've
>>>>> already reviewed and the onces you haven't.
>>>>>
>>>>> When you click on a talk, you'll see the abstract and additional
>>>>> information. You can then vote on it, that's all that's needed. One you
>>>>> hit "submit" it will show the next abstract in the list, this should
>>>>> make the review as fast as possible with as little clicks as possible.
>>>>> If you come across your own proposals, please don't vote on them :)
>>>>>
>>>>> You can also leave a message (you don't have to) that can then be used
>>>>> by the committee for the final selection. My intention is that you don't
>>>>> give a full review, but just some notes that might be useful for the
>>>>> final selection process. It's for things like "I don't think that is
>>>>> open source" or "This sounds very similar to xyz" or to make you
>>>>> remember details that you want to share at the final selection. So use
>>>>> it sparsely as it will make the spreadsheet we do the final selection on
>>>>> only bigger ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> The deadline for the reviews is 2016-04-11. So please start early (in
>>>>> case the system has bugs) so that you really have the time to get
>>>>> through all the abstracts (which would be ideal).
>>>>>
>>>>> In case you wonder about the ordering. It is randomly ordered, but it's
>>>>> the same every time you look at it. That's just a simple way to reduce
>>>>> the bias a bit as all of us will have a different order.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you've any questions or find bugs or usability issues, please let me
>>>>> know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>   Volker
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> FOSS4G2016 mailing list
>>>>> FOSS4G2016 at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2016
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> FOSS4G2016 mailing list
>>> FOSS4G2016 at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2016