[FOSS4G2016] Attendance fee and transparency report

[till.adams at fossgis.de]

Thanks Volker.

As said before, stop this discussion or discuss it internally with 
interested people.
I am out here.


The transparency report **after** the conference is great and I 
definitely think it's a good idea.
AFTER the conference.

Till


Am 2016-05-09 11:47, schrieb Volker Mische:
> Hi LOC,
>
> this whole thread got into the direction it wasn't intended. We
> shouldn't discuss the pricing here. The purpose is to ask whether you
> think such a transparency report makes sense or not/is helpful.
>
> Cheers,
>   Volker
>
>
> On 05/09/2016 08:28 AM, Volker Mische wrote:
>> Hi LOC,
>>
>> the intention is *not* to change our pricing, just forward the 
>> feedback
>> I got. There are already two speakers who can't attend because the 
>> 600
>> EUR are too much.
>>
>> I know that's a general topic that should be discussed with a 
>> broader
>> audience (the whole OSGeo, not only this list), I just felt obliged 
>> to
>> let the LOC know :)
>>
>> For those who can't attend it will be to late, but I plan to do a
>> transparency report after the conference similar to the LXJS 2012 
>> [1] or
>> JS Unconf 2014 [2].
>>
>> What do you think about the idea?
>>
>> [1]: http://2013.lxjs.org/about
>> [2]: http://2014.jsunconf.eu/news/js-unconf-transparency-report/
>>
>> Cheers,
>>   Volker
>>
> _______________________________________________
> FOSS4G2016 mailing list
> FOSS4G2016 at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2016