[FOSS4G2016] Attendance fee and transparency report

[Christian Mayer]

Hi Volker,

it would be great to publish such a transparency report after the conference. It
really gives the right amount of insight to the public.

Cheers,
Chris


> Volker Mische <volker.mische at gmail.com> hat am 9. Mai 2016 um 11:47
> geschrieben:
> 
> 
> Hi LOC,
> 
> this whole thread got into the direction it wasn't intended. We
> shouldn't discuss the pricing here. The purpose is to ask whether you
> think such a transparency report makes sense or not/is helpful.
> 
> Cheers,
>   Volker
> 
> 
> On 05/09/2016 08:28 AM, Volker Mische wrote:
> > Hi LOC,
> > 
> > the intention is *not* to change our pricing, just forward the feedback
> > I got. There are already two speakers who can't attend because the 600
> > EUR are too much.
> > 
> > I know that's a general topic that should be discussed with a broader
> > audience (the whole OSGeo, not only this list), I just felt obliged to
> > let the LOC know :)
> > 
> > For those who can't attend it will be to late, but I plan to do a
> > transparency report after the conference similar to the LXJS 2012 [1] or
> > JS Unconf 2014 [2].
> > 
> > What do you think about the idea?
> > 
> > [1]: http://2013.lxjs.org/about
> > [2]: http://2014.jsunconf.eu/news/js-unconf-transparency-report/
> > 
> > Cheers,
> >   Volker
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> FOSS4G2016 mailing list
> FOSS4G2016 at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2016