[fusion-dev] Fusion 1.1 Status

[Paul Spencer]

Hi Zac,

I think Mike has been steadily working on bugs for 1.1 as well as  
finishing up features for 2.0.  I'd personally like to see 1.1  
finalized soon, so if you want to do some testing that would help a  
lot.  One of the things we added to 1.1 was a compatibility mode for  
the existing templates so that it can be a drop-in replacement for the  
existing fusion code, which should make upgrading easier!

I believe mgos 2.1 is tracking Fusion trunk which will be branched for  
a 2.0 version shortly too, so my fears of 1.1 slipping between  
releases seem to have materialized, but no matter - both contain  
important code and 1.1 might get rolled into another 2.0 minor update  
if I can convince Tom its a good idea :)

 From this point forward, I believe that mgos is using svn externals  
to include fusion, so checking in built versions would only apply up  
to the current point in time I think (unless I am missing the point  
somehow)

Paul


On 22-Oct-08, at 4:05 AM, Zac Spitzer wrote:

> How is 1.1 going?, it been a while since RC1 I'm happy to do some  
> more testing.
>
> When 1.1 is released, I'm thinking about a few ideas which would make
> adoption easier.
>
> Once is to create a windows installer which is MGOS and MGE aware so  
> people can
> easily update (replace) older fusion installs.
>
> Secondly, what do people think about checking in built releases of
> fusion into subversion?
>
> builds\stable
> builds\development
> builds\1.06
> builds\1.1RC1
>
> That way users can a simple svn update to update fusion.
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Zac Spitzer -
> http://zacster.blogspot.com (My Blog)
> +61 405 847 168
> _______________________________________________
> fusion-dev mailing list
> fusion-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fusion-dev


__________________________________________

    Paul Spencer
    Chief Technology Officer
    DM Solutions Group Inc
    http://research.dmsolutions.ca/