[Gdal-dev] Re: DISOWN in ogr.i

[Ari Jolma]

Charlie Savage kirjoitti:
> Okay, I'll try to upgrade the Ruby bindings then to match.  What do 
> you think of replacing the DISOWN type maps with %delobject?  I would 
> have much preferred that if it was available last year.

That wouldn't work since %delobject would disown self and at least in 
all three cases in ogr.i we want to disown the 2nd argument?

Ari

>
> Charlie
>
> Ari Jolma wrote:
>> Charlie Savage kirjoitti:
>>> If this is the same DISOWN as Ruby/Python, I suppose that would be
>>> another argument for using SWIG 1.3.29 since it would avoid special
>>> cases for Perl.
>>
>> Yes I think it is. I upgraded to swig 1.3.29 and updated the Perl
>> wrappers also at CVS. Sorry for the confusion, ogr.i is v. 1.55 now
>> which is the same as 1.53, is there an undo for CVS?
>>
>> Ari
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
Prof. Ari Jolma
Kartografia ja Geoinformatiikka / Cartography and Geoinformatics
Teknillinen Korkeakoulu / Helsinki University of Technology
POBox 1200, 02015 TKK, Finland
Email: ari.jolma at tkk.fi URL: http://www.tkk.fi/~jolma