[Gdal-dev] Re: DISOWN in ogr.i

[Charlie Savage]

Right, good point.

Charlie

Ari Jolma wrote:
> Charlie Savage kirjoitti:
>> Okay, I'll try to upgrade the Ruby bindings then to match.  What do 
>> you think of replacing the DISOWN type maps with %delobject?  I would 
>> have much preferred that if it was available last year.
>
> That wouldn't work since %delobject would disown self and at least in 
> all three cases in ogr.i we want to disown the 2nd argument?
>
> Ari
>
>>
>> Charlie
>>
>> Ari Jolma wrote:
>>> Charlie Savage kirjoitti:
>>>> If this is the same DISOWN as Ruby/Python, I suppose that would be
>>>> another argument for using SWIG 1.3.29 since it would avoid special
>>>> cases for Perl.
>>>
>>> Yes I think it is. I upgraded to swig 1.3.29 and updated the Perl
>>> wrappers also at CVS. Sorry for the confusion, ogr.i is v. 1.55 now
>>> which is the same as 1.53, is there an undo for CVS?
>>>
>>> Ari
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3166 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20060412/8a6dcb86/smime.bin