[Gdal-dev] Any possibility of static compile?

[Mateusz Loskot]

Curt, WE7U wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Curt, WE7U wrote:
> 
>> Hopefully it's just a C++ syntax error?  This is gdal-1.3.2b2 I'm 
>> working with, and the bit of code is:
>> 
>> 
>> catch (exception *) {
> 
> Sorry, the original code had no space between "exception" and "*".
> 
> I replaced it with this, stolen from somewhere else in the GDAL code:
> 
> 
> catch (const std::exception &e) {
> 
> It gets further into the compile now.  Is the change correct?

>From C++ point of view, yest, it's perfectly correct.
It's not recommended, and it's not needed, to pass and catch
standard exceptions by pointers.

Cheers
-- 
Mateusz Loskot
http://mateusz.loskot.net