[Gdal-dev] GDAL_warp output image sizes vary.... Why?

[Sampson, David]

 Frank,


For the time being I am using the -ts option and defining the outpout
file size. Not the cleanest fix but will work for my next release.

If nothing jumps out at you right now, perhaps I might be able to line
up some test images in the new year for you.

Maybe around the same time we can look closer at the gdal_Translate
buggs with the GCP's.

Thanks for the response. At least I'm not missing something obvious.

Cheers

Happy holidays.



-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Warmerdam [mailto:warmerdam at pobox.com] 
Sent: December 20, 2006 13:10
To: Sampson, David
Cc: gdal-dev at lists.maptools.org
Subject: Re: [Gdal-dev] GDAL_warp output image sizes vary.... Why?

Sampson, David wrote:
> List,
> 
> Here are some of the results of tiffinfo.
> 
> Sorry about incorrect info. I meant the image starts at 16 bit and 
> ends off as 8 bit.
> 
> Here are the appropriate outputs

Dave,

Despite my hopes, there is nothing like compression to explain this.

If you can supply me with an input file, a gdal_translate or gdalwarp
commandline and the output file you get that is noticably larger I can
look into this in more detail.  It is not at all obvious why this should
be happening.

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------
---------------------------------------+------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,
warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo,
http://osgeo.org