[Gdal-dev] Motion: To approve RFC 6 - Geometry and Feature style as OGR Special Fields

[Howard Butler]

+0.

At 08:52 AM 11/27/2006, Daniel Morissette wrote:
>I'll vote +1.
>
>However, the fact that the special fields take precedence over other 
>fields with the same names in the data file bugs me a little bit. I 
>do not have a better suggestion to make, but at a minimum the 
>special field names and this behavior should be well documented in a 
>prominent place to avoid users getting caught by this magic.
>
>Perhaps ogrinfo could also be modified to detect this case and issue 
>a warning if it finds those special fields in a dataset?
>
>Daniel
>
>
>Frank Warmerdam wrote:
>>Folks,
>>Motion: To approve RFC 6 - Geometry and Feature style as OGR Special Fields.
>>While I have not done a detailed review of the patch, I'm very pleased with
>>the new capability, and the approach taken.  I will take responsibility for
>>some post-patch integration testing as well as writing script(s) for the test
>>suite.
>>I'm keen to get this in place with a few days to shake things out before the
>>first GDAL/OGR 1.4.0 Beta (circa December 1st).
>>I'll start voting with a "+1".
>>Best regards,
>
>
>--
>Daniel Morissette
>http://www.mapgears.com/
>_______________________________________________
>Gdal-dev mailing list
>Gdal-dev at lists.maptools.org
>http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev