[Gdal-dev] r.out.gdal vs gdal_translate vs gdalwarp

[Maciej Sieczka]

"Frank Warmerdam-2" wrote:

>You could file a bug report on the issue, but it isn't likely to be very
> high priority since there is a straight forward workaround.

I have just noticed that using compression might well boost the difference
in gdalwarp and gdal_translate output.

I have a GeoTIFF which is 47,605,938 bytes uncompressed. Deflated with
gdalwarp it's 20,513,882 bytes, while deflated with gdal_translate it's
13,734,032 bytes.  7 MBs, 45%  difference.

It looks like it is *always* a good idea to process any gdalwarp GeoTIFF
output with gdal_translate.

Maciek

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/r.out.gdal-vs-gdal_translate-vs-gdalwarp-tf3717930.html#a10987837
Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.