[Gdal-dev] GTOPO30 and max value
Ivan Lucena
ivan.lucena at pmldnet.com
Wed May 30 17:08:20 EDT 2007
Markus,
I found one situation where the AUX file was inconsistent with the AIG
dataset. Gdalinfo was reporting correctly 'unsigned 8 bit', while ArcMap was
reporting 'unsigned 16'. I just remove the .AUX file and the problem was
gone. Is it possible that you are facing the same problem?
Best regards,
Ivan Lucena
-----Original Message-----
From: gdal-dev-bounces at lists.maptools.org
[mailto:gdal-dev-bounces at lists.maptools.org] On Behalf Of Markus Neteler
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 4:32 PM
To: GDAL-dev list
Subject: Re: [Gdal-dev] GTOPO30 and max value
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 12:56:35PM -0400, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Markus Neteler wrote:
> > Hi,
> > should GDAL read the GTOPO30 data properly?
> > gdalinfo -mm W100N40.DEM
> > Driver: EHdr/ESRI .hdr Labelled
> > Size is 4800, 6000
> > Coordinate System is:
> > GEOGCS["WGS 84",
> > DATUM["WGS_1984",
> > SPHEROID["WGS 84",6378137,298.257223563,
> > AUTHORITY["EPSG","7030"]],
> > TOWGS84[0,0,0,0,0,0,0],
> > AUTHORITY["EPSG","6326"]],
> > PRIMEM["Greenwich",0,
> > AUTHORITY["EPSG","8901"]],
> > UNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433,
> > AUTHORITY["EPSG","9108"]],
> > AXIS["Lat",NORTH],
> > AXIS["Long",EAST],
> > AUTHORITY["EPSG","4326"]]
> > Origin = (-100.000000000000000,39.999999999999993)
> > Pixel Size = (0.008333333333330,-0.008333333333330)
> > Corner Coordinates:
> > Upper Left (-100.0000000, 40.0000000) (100d 0'0.00"W, 40d 0'0.00"N)
> > Lower Left (-100.0000000, -10.0000000) (100d 0'0.00"W, 10d 0'0.00"S)
> > Upper Right ( -60.0000000, 40.0000000) ( 60d 0'0.00"W, 40d 0'0.00"N)
> > Lower Right ( -60.0000000, -10.0000000) ( 60d 0'0.00"W, 10d 0'0.00"S)
> > Center ( -80.0000000, 15.0000000) ( 80d 0'0.00"W, 15d 0'0.00"N)
> > Band 1 Block=4800x1 Type=UInt16, ColorInterp=Undefined
> > Min=-9999.000 Max=6710.000 Computed Min/Max=1.000,55537.000
> > Minimum=-9999.000, Maximum=6710.000, Mean=-6078.800, StdDev=5044.200
> > NoData Value=-9999
> > -> Computed Min/Max=1.000,55537.000
> > is confusing me. Maybe a bug in the data set?
>
> Markus,
>
> It would be helpful to see the .HDR file. It seems likely that the
> data is actually signed 16bit integer, but being interpreted as
> unsigned 16bit integer. EHDR .HDR files are notoriously underspecified.
> I think when used with Arc/Info there was some information (like pixel
> type) that was passed on the commandline or something.
>
Frank,
it looks like this:
cat W100N40.HDR
BYTEORDER M
LAYOUT BIL
NROWS 6000
NCOLS 4800
NBANDS 1
NBITS 16
BANDROWBYTES 9600
TOTALROWBYTES 9600
BANDGAPBYTES 0
NODATA -9999
ULXMAP -99.99583333333334
ULYMAP 39.99583333333333
XDIM 0.00833333333333
YDIM 0.00833333333333
Best,
Markus
------------------
ITC -> dall'1 marzo 2007 Fondazione Bruno Kessler
ITC -> since 1 March 2007 Fondazione Bruno Kessler
------------------
_______________________________________________
Gdal-dev mailing list
Gdal-dev at lists.maptools.org
http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
More information about the Gdal-dev
mailing list