[gdal-dev] Motion: Commiter Status for Moratto

[Tamas Szekeres]

Ivan,

I'm +1 to the motion to add Stefano as a commiter.


With regards to the addition it would be required to restructure the
implementation can be found in
http://svn.osgeo.org/gdal/sandbox/ilucena/swig/ a bit before adding it
to the trunk.
Any of the SWIG bindings should be built upon a common ground just
like for the other languages we currently have. I think one of the
most important goals around here is to ensure the proper convergence
between the interfaces that the various languages can provide.
Currently all of the SWIG bindings are derived from the interface
files in the /swig/include directory of the gdal project tree. These
files contain the desired wrappers (shadow classes) of the GDAL C API.
The generated interfaces will finally link against the gdal.dll and
doesn't create a separate dll for hosting the gdal/ogr related code.

Would it be realizable to follow the policy mentioned above?


Best regards,

Tamas




2008/2/27, Lucena, Ivan <ivan.lucena at pmldnet.com>:
> Moratto has been using GDAL in the development of Delphi application for
>  quite some time now, but as his work has evolved he felt the need to use
>  SWIG to generate a wrapper. The problem is that there no official Delphi
>  module in SWIG, so he developed it himself.
>
>  Moratto would need the Commiter Status to migrate the wrapper from my
>  sandbox to the trunk to continue his work in the development of the GDAL
>  Delphi wrapper.
>
>  Moratto has reviewed RFC 3 on commiter responsibilities, and has agreed
>  to them.
>
>  Best regards,
>
>
>  Ivan Lucena
>  _______________________________________________
>  gdal-dev mailing list
>  gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>  http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>