[gdal-dev] Proposal to split this list into gdal-dev and gdal-users

[Gregory, Matthew]

Russell McOrmand wrote:
>    As a user I appreciate the heads-up of the developer 
> conversations and the who-is-who of the administrative 
> conversations.  If the list were split into 3 I would try to 
> subscribe to all 3.

As an avid lurker, I'd echo this sentiment.  Much of the listserve traffic may be over my head, but it always presents opportunities to dig more into the guts of GDAL and recognize issues in my own code that I didn't realize I had.

My concern about a gdal-users list would be just what Frank mentions - namely that developers may not be as involved on such a list.  I'm always floored by how patient the developers of GDAL are and how very few threads go unaddressed.  Selfishly, I wouldn't want that resource split up.

thanks, matt

Matt Gregory
Faculty Research Assistant
Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society
Oregon State University