Re: [gdal-dev] Frank Eats Crow - or Fixing PixelIsPoint Interpretation

[Ivan Lucena]

Frank,

Courageous decision!

But I got confused by that sentence:

"In GDAL 1.7 and 1.6 branch the same changes will be applied, except the GTIFF_POINT_GEO_IGNORE configuration 
option will default to FALSE."

Did you mean to say TRUE?

Regards,

Ivan

>  -------Original Message-------
>  From: Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com>
>  To: gdal-dev <gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>  Subject: [gdal-dev] Frank Eats Crow - or Fixing PixelIsPoint Interpretation
>  Sent: Nov 15 '10 20:40
>  
>  Folks,
>  
>  After 15 years of denial, and bullheadedness it is now time for me to
>  admit my interpretation of PixelIsPoint in GeoTIFF files is wrong.  To that
>  end I have prepared a brief RFC discussing how I intend to fix it.  I'd
>  appreciate comment before calling for a vote.
>  
>     http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc33_gtiff_pixelispoint
>  
>  Mmmm, crow - it tastes just like chicken!
>  
>  Best regards,
>  --
>  ---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
>  I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
>  light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
>  and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  gdal-dev mailing list
>  gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>  http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>