[gdal-dev] Motion: Approve RFC 33 - GeoTIFF - Fixing PixelIsPoint Interpretation

Frank Warmerdam warmerdam at pobox.com
Mon Nov 22 15:50:08 EST 2010

Howard Butler wrote:
> As long as we're approving (slightly) painful RFCs, what are people's thoughts on installing GDAL's includes by default in a number-prefixed directory instead of in the global directory?  
> For example, instead of installing in 
> /usr/local/include/gdal.h
> for GDAL 1.8, we'd install in
> /usr/local/include/gdal18/gdal.h
> Do we need an RFC for this?


I am in support of such a change.  I think a brief RFC might be in order.

Best regards,
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent

More information about the gdal-dev mailing list