[gdal-dev] Motion: Approve RFC 33 - GeoTIFF - Fixing PixelIsPoint Interpretation

Ari Jolma ari.jolma at gmail.com
Mon Nov 22 16:10:17 EST 2010

On 11/22/2010 10:50 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Howard Butler wrote:
>> As long as we're approving (slightly) painful RFCs, what are people's 
>> thoughts on installing GDAL's includes by default in a 
>> number-prefixed directory instead of in the global directory?
>> For example, instead of installing in /usr/local/include/gdal.h
>> for GDAL 1.8, we'd install in
>> /usr/local/include/gdal18/gdal.h
>> Do we need an RFC for this?
> Howard,
> I am in support of such a change.  I think a brief RFC might be in order.

I added that into my wishlist for GDAL 2.0 :)


but the sooner the better.


> Best regards,

More information about the gdal-dev mailing list