[gdal-dev] Re: NITF driver reads GEOLOB, but does not write it.

[turtlewax]

Even thanks for all your help. With the correct syntax the NITF generation
does complete without error.  But it seems that writing GEOLOB also changes
the way IGEOLO is written.

EXAMPLE:

If I don't create the GEOLOB, then IGEOLO is written as follows.
IGEOLO  258041N0665839E250841N0665915E250807N0665915E250807N0665839E

If I create a GEOLOB, then IGEOLO is written as follows.
IGEOLO	+25.145+066.977+25.145+066.987+25.135+066.987+25.135+066.977

This causes problems for viewers that I have tested (ERDAS and Global
Mapper).

QUESTION: 
If I write manually GEOLOB, am I required to manually provide other TREs?
-- 
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/NITF-driver-reads-GEOLOB-but-does-not-write-it-tp5563144p5570329.html
Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.