[gdal-dev] Re: FileGDB OGR driver test

[Even Rouault]

Le mercredi 13 avril 2011 21:00:42, Eli Adam a écrit :
> Ragi,
> 
>      I tested the driver on just one FileGDB which included a date
> field.  You stated,
> 
> Known issues with build / FileGDB driver
> - (driver issue) blobs and date fields are not handled at all

Yesterday, with the Michael Smith's test filegdb, I fixed the handling of date 
fields, so if you just update from SVN, it should work now.

An example with blobs would be usefull

> 
> Here is what I did and successfully got the data.  The date field was
> made a double and populated with 0, however, since it says that date
> fields are not handled, it is nice that the rest of the process still
> worked on the other fields and the data was exported.
> 
> ogr2ogr ODF_Lincoln_Roads.shp West_Oregon_Roads.gdb
> "ODF_Lincoln_Roads"
> Warning 6: Field RDSRCDATE create as date field, though DateTime
> requested.
> 
> Warning 6: Normalized/laundered field name: 'CONSTRUCTED' to
> 'CONSTRUCTE'
> Warning 6: Normalized/laundered field name: 'Shape_Length' to
> 'Shape_Leng'
> Warning 1: Row id: 4 col:10 has unhandled col type (11). Setting to
> NULL.
> ERROR 1: GDB Error: Failed to determine value for column CONST_DATE
> long:-2147217395
> ERROR 1: GDB Error: Failed to determine value for column CONST_DATE
> long:-2147217395
> 
> Thanks for the work on this.
> 
> Eli
> 
> >>> On 4/13/2011 at 11:13 AM, in message
> 
> <BANLkTimiTsqYJfixFRyS05JKEibyA+tf3A at mail.gmail.com>, Ragi Burhum
> 
> <ragi at burhum.com> wrote:
> > Perfect. Thank you Michael.
> > 
> > - Ragi
> > 
> >> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:45:25 -0400
> >> From: "Smith, Michael ERDC-CRREL-NH" <michael.smith at usace.army.mil>
> >> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Re: FileGDB OGR driver test
> >> To: Even Rouault <even.rouault at mines-paris.org>,
> >> 
> >>        <gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
> >> 
> >> Message-ID: <C9CA2415.2220D%michael.smith at usace.army.mil>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="ISO-8859-1"
> >> 
> >> I have a test v10 filegdb with points, lines, polygons (all with Z
> 
> and M
> 
> >> but
> >> I think the measures aren't populated). There are also some non
> 
> geometry
> 
> >> tables and some relationship classes.
> >> 
> >> Its available at
> >> 
> >> http://12.189.158.78:8081/downloads/test_fgdb.gdb.zip
> >> 
> >> Mike
> >> 
> >> 
> >> --
> >> Michael Smith
> >> Remote Sensing/GIS Center
> >> US Army Corps of Engineers
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On 4/12/11 2:48 PM, "Even Rouault" <even.rouault at mines-paris.org>
> 
> wrote:
> >> > Le mardi 12 avril 2011 20:40:58, Matt Wilkie a écrit :
> >> >>> ArcGIS 10 FileGDB's right ?
> >> >> 
> >> >> If the api allows for using gdb's from different versions then
> 
> the test
> 
> >> >> suite should have different versions too. In any case I can make
> 
> v10
> 
> >> gdb's.
> >> 
> >> > No, the FileGDB API only reads v10 gdb's.
> >> > 
> >> >>> Current GDAL trunk builds against FileGDB API beta3 under Linux
> 
> 32bit.
> 
> >> >>> Too bad ESRI doesn't provide any 64bit build of the FileGDB API
> 
> (yet...
> 
> >> >>> ?)
> >> >> 
> >> >> """
> >> >> We are working on a Linux 64-bit release of the File Geodatabase
> 
> API. It
> 
> >> >> will not release with the 1.0 release of the API, but as a part
> 
> of a
> 
> >> >> follow on release later this year.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Lance Shipman
> >> >> Geodatabase Product Engineer, File Geodatabase
> >> >> esri
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev