[gdal-dev] Fwd: Re: [Live-demo] Re: Liberal licensing of Project Overviews in LiveDVD, do we want this?

[Ari Jolma]

On 07/08/2011 07:55 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> below Simon's answer to my answers to his post on the live-demo list :
> http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/live-demo/2011-July/003653.html
>
> Do you have opinions on how we should handle the licence of documentation on
> gdal.org ?

Would it be enough to add something to the Doxyfile tag HTML_FOOTER, 
which states what the documentation is? That way it gets to the bottom 
of every page of gdal.org. The footer can't be the whole licence, 
though. MIT licence does not seem to have a definitive web page and the 
wikipedia page states that "MIT Licence" is ambiguous.

Regards,

Ari

> Best regards,
>
> Even
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20110708/e9addc1d/attachment.html