[gdal-dev] Fwd: Re: [Live-demo] Re: Liberal licensing of Project Overviews in LiveDVD, do we want this?

[Frank Warmerdam]

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Ari Jolma <ari.jolma at gmail.com> wrote:
> Would it be enough to add something to the Doxyfile tag HTML_FOOTER, which
> states what the documentation is? That way it gets to the bottom of every
> page of gdal.org. The footer can't be the whole licence, though. MIT licence
> does not seem to have a definitive web page and the wikipedia page states
> that "MIT Licence" is ambiguous.

Ari,

I would agree having a standard statement in the footer makes sense
and I would suggest it be url linked to:

http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/FAQGeneral#WhatlicensedoesGDALOGRuse

which might be clarified a bit (and also the LICENSE file) with regard to
documentation.

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Software Developer