[gdal-dev] GDAL for Python 3.2 on Windows 64bit

[Tamas Szekeres]

I'm just working on to include that in the builds at
http://www.gisinternals.com/sdk/

Unfortunately I always have to patch the python-distutils stuff from
versions to versions so as to make it work with all the supported
compilers...

Best regards,

Tamas


2011/7/9 Isaac Gerg <isaac.gerg at gergltd.com>

> Do you guys know when 3.2 will be supported?  How do I build from 3.2
> currently using the patches you mentioned -- are there instructions
> anywhere?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Isaac
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Even Rouault <even.rouault at mines-paris.org
> > wrote:
>
>> Le samedi 09 juillet 2011 13:56:54, Tamas Szekeres a écrit :
>> > 2011/7/8 Even Rouault <even.rouault at mines-paris.org>
>> >
>> > > http://vbkto.dyndns.org/sdk/ proposes bindings for 2.6, 2.7 and 3.1.
>> > > Perhaps
>> > > Tamas would want to add support for 3.2 ?
>> >
>> > How do we stand with the Python 3.2 support in GDAL? Do we still require
>> to
>> > patch the gererated interface files so as to compile the bindings
>> > successfully?
>> > I'm a bit hesitant to include a patching step as part of the build
>> > execution sequence.
>>
>> I've just downloaded the latest swig version 2.0.4 and the good news is
>> that
>> it now generates binding files compatible with Python 3.2 (as well as with
>> previous Python versions). I also tested quickly with Java and Perl and
>> the
>> generated files are good enough to enable "make test" to run successfully.
>>
>> However, with CSharp, the generated cpp files have the following duplicate
>> declaration
>>
>>  static OsrPINVOKE() {
>>  }
>>
>>  static OsrPINVOKE() {
>>  }
>>
>> which causes the following error :
>>
>> mcs /debug:full /target:library /out:osr_csharp.dll osr/*.cs
>> AssemblyInfo.cs
>> osr/OsrPINVOKE.cs(192,10): error CS0111: A member
>> `OSGeo.OSR.OsrPINVOKE.OsrPINVOKE()' is already defined. Rename this member
>> or
>> use different parameter types
>> osr/OsrPINVOKE.cs(188,10): (Location of the symbol related to previous
>> error)
>>
>> whereas it is ok with swig 1.3.40
>>
>> I couldn't find a relevant ticket in their bug tracker about this
>> duplicate
>> PINVOKE.
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > Tamas
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20110709/f8869581/attachment.html