[gdal-dev] postgis: strange behavior when 'public' schema does not exist

[Chaitanya kumar CH]

Thanks Martijn,

I missed the sentence "It can be dropped, too" when I first read it.
I opened a ticket for this issue.

http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4611

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Chaitanya kumar CH <
> chaitanya.ch at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Martijn,
>>
>> Thanks for the excellent error report.
>> I couldn't find any statement for or against the requirement for the
>> public schema. Can you provide a reference to this?
>>
>>
>>
> It's in 5.7.3 of the PostgreSQL documentation:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/ddl-schemas.html
>
> 'There is nothing special about the public schema except that it exists by
> default. It can be dropped, too.'
>
>
> --
> martijn van exel
> geospatial omnivore
> 1109 1st ave #2
> salt lake city, ut 84103
> 801-550-5815
> http://oegeo.wordpress.com
>



-- 
Best regards,
Chaitanya kumar CH.

+91-9494447584
17.2416N 80.1426E
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20120412/73544d8e/attachment.html