[gdal-dev] Motion: Promote GDAL 1.9.0RC1 as GDAL 1.9.0 Final

[Etienne Tourigny]

What is the status of Windows 32-bit and 64-bit ?  Have they been
tested outside of Tamas' build bot?

best wishes for 2012,
Etienne

On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Even Rouault
<even.rouault at mines-paris.org> wrote:
> Le dimanche 01 janvier 2012 02:38:00, Frank Warmerdam a écrit :
>> Motion: To promote the GDAL/OGR 1.9.0RC1 release candidate as
>>             the final GDAL/OGR 1.9.0 release.
>>
>
> I've managed to compile it (or the betas) on a variety of Unixes (CentOS 6.2,
> Ubuntu 11.10, FreeBSD 8.0, NetBSD 5, OpenBSD 4.5, Solaris 10 and 11, Debian
> Lenny on a big-endian host) and things seem to be in good shape.
>
> Has anyone tested on MacOS X ?
>
> The only regression I've found so far is in the Rasterlite driver ( fixed in
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4413 ). It was hidden by another problem in
> the lastest libspatialite3.0.0 that was exhibited by the GDAL autotests. But I
> don't think it justifies another RC per se.
>
> *Last minute* : I've just tested with CentOS 4.7 and CentOS 5.6 and I've found
> a compilation problem with the sqlite driver (and in the GML driver when
> sqlite3 support is available). Those 2 OS ship with sqlite 3.3.6, but we now
> use various methods that weren't yet available. This is now fixed in trunk and
> 1.9 branch (see http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4418 for details ). Not sure
> if it is worth a RC2.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Even
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev