[gdal-dev] Motion: Promote GDAL 1.9.0RC1 as GDAL 1.9.0 Final
szekerest at gmail.com
Mon Jan 2 09:09:03 EST 2012
GDAL autotests are looking good on Win64. Futher tests are welcome.
2012/1/2 Etienne Tourigny <etourigny.dev at gmail.com>
> What is the status of Windows 32-bit and 64-bit ? Have they been
> tested outside of Tamas' build bot?
> best wishes for 2012,
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Even Rouault
> <even.rouault at mines-paris.org> wrote:
> > Le dimanche 01 janvier 2012 02:38:00, Frank Warmerdam a écrit :
> >> Motion: To promote the GDAL/OGR 1.9.0RC1 release candidate as
> >> the final GDAL/OGR 1.9.0 release.
> > I've managed to compile it (or the betas) on a variety of Unixes (CentOS
> > Ubuntu 11.10, FreeBSD 8.0, NetBSD 5, OpenBSD 4.5, Solaris 10 and 11,
> > Lenny on a big-endian host) and things seem to be in good shape.
> > Has anyone tested on MacOS X ?
> > The only regression I've found so far is in the Rasterlite driver (
> fixed in
> > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4413 ). It was hidden by another
> problem in
> > the lastest libspatialite3.0.0 that was exhibited by the GDAL autotests.
> But I
> > don't think it justifies another RC per se.
> > *Last minute* : I've just tested with CentOS 4.7 and CentOS 5.6 and I've
> > a compilation problem with the sqlite driver (and in the GML driver when
> > sqlite3 support is available). Those 2 OS ship with sqlite 3.3.6, but we
> > use various methods that weren't yet available. This is now fixed in
> trunk and
> > 1.9 branch (see http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4418 for details ).
> Not sure
> > if it is worth a RC2.
> > Best regards,
> > Even
> > _______________________________________________
> > gdal-dev mailing list
> > gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gdal-dev